[2ndDivisionVet]

I love it when people write on a subject so obviously outside their experience and knowledge. I wonder if Veronica has ever even held a firearm in her hands, much less used one? And I guarantee you that there are more than 74,000 minority members in the NRA (she somehow misunderstood her referenced site) when the rolls are being expanded at a rate of over 8,000 a day.

[txnativegop]

What a racist! Oh wait! she’s a Leftie, I forgot, she’s allowed to be racist. Never mind.

[xrmusn]

I must say, when you look at a lot of this stuff it is necessary to see if it is satire or not.
But, deep down you know it isn’t and these idiots are really this shallow and uninformed.

The ‘new’ criteria is ‘if you are white, you are racist’. End of statement.

I have declared I am a [racist, sexist, homophobe] etc if, for nothing else just so ‘they’ can’t accuse me anymore.

[kcvl]

VeronicaS

[Washi]

They’ve gone back to the race-baiting-well so many times on so many issues that they don’t even make an effort at honest debate anymore.

[jz638]

But what if most of the 4.3 million members of the NRA were law abiding black and brown folks?

If most of the 4.3 million members of the NRA were law abiding black and brown folks, violent crime in minority-concentrated areas would likely be much lower because law-abiding citizens wouldn't let themselves be disarmed with the same vigor. One thing emboldens criminals with guns more than anything else: the knowledge that law-abiding residents won't have have a gun to defend themselves.

[Cicero]

Well, because most inner city blacks own ILLEGAL GUNS, so there would be no point in their paying dues to the NRA.

I don’t know the exact figures, but I think something like 70 or 80% of gun murders in this country are committed by blacks or hispanics. And they don’t belong to the NRA. And they do their killings mostly in gun-free inner cities.

[theBuckwheat]

Recall the old warning that he who controls the meaning of words controls the outcome of a debate. In the context of Critical Race Theory, this was never more true than in the current discourse about being “black” in America. So, just exactly is meant by “race” and especially, by “black”?

When Nobel Prize winning poet Tony Morrison, who is African-American, can write an October 1988 New Yorker article titled “Clinton as the first black president”, then what is “black”? When the NAACP calls the black conservative Kenneth Gladney, “not black enough”, and “not a brother” then what is “black”? When Time magazine’s Jack White calls Supreme Court Justice Thomas, “the scariest of all the hobgoblins”, saying “Washington seems to be filled with white men who make black people uneasy”, than what is “black”? And when Obama, a man whose mother is Caucasian, and whose father is only part African Negro and and part Arab, can tell us his autobiography that in his youth he struggled with his racial identity before *deciding* to be black, what is “black”?

When Bill Maher, during a panel discussion on HBO complains that Obama’s policies are “half-assed” “because he’s only half black.” and that “if he was fully black, I’m telling you, he would be a better president.”, and that “there’s a white man in him holding him back”, than what is “black”?

“Black” in all these contexts, as well as Juan Williams’s complaint on Fox News that the extraordinarily lopsided expression of Missouri voter sentiment in August of 2010 rejecting ObamaCare (in one county by 92%) was really about race, is not about “race” at all. It is about ideology, socialist ideology. Clearly, “black” is really RED.

[Boiling point]

After the vote on the gun bill, we should pull what the left pulled on Scott Walker and start recall action on everyone that votes for it. I know some states don’t allow for recall.

[Baynative]

What if NOW really supported women instead of liberal misogynists?