|
I am also on facebook, if anybody does that, at
http://www.facebook.com/anonymousconservative
The Republican Party lost because it lacks leadership.
And after the election it still lacks leadership.
They’re not standing up for anything. They’re not leading any movements.
They’re just the alternative to Obama - and with their calls to raise taxes and open the borders, they’re not even doing that in a lot of cases.
Romney was right about one thing: the ‘Rats won because Obama is adept and giving his voters stuff from the public treasury. The ‘Rats are a coalition of moochers. They vote ‘Rat because Obama delivered on the loot - Obama phones, food stamps, ending welfare-to-work, etc. We now have 51% living off 49%. In any democracy, this is probably inevitable. Which is why we were supposed to have a republic where the voting franchise was limited to producers, but we devolved into a let-anybody-vote democracy. What else could we expect but Jefferson’s two wolves and a sheep voting on what they’ll have for dinner?
Despite overusing the word “amygdalae”, I basically agree with you. The Soros paid communist propaganda machine controlled the narrative while the Kenyan spent 6 trillion buying up votes. In the end, the Kenyan still had to steal votes to win.
How do conservatives regain power? The easy way is if NYC, Richmond, Tampa, Philly, Denver, Chicago and Las Vegas are nuked. The harder way is to blame the coming economic collapse on the Kenyan.
Resist we much!
Paragraph after paragraph, let me do it in one word RINO.
Even you are way too kind to the socialists. You need to explain very simply how your side is better and works for the public good as opposed to redistributive malaise and capital constriction. Until then, until we have a plain speaking common sense person who can truly explain why capitalist policies are for the greater good, the socialsits will continue to keep racism, perversion, sick voter alliances and bigger and bigger governemnt as their power base to maintain control and power. The Repub/Independents need to work on controlling the Senate and House first in two years. In the end that is what it is about for them: power and control, not the greatest good for the greatest number. Think about it a lot harder, metaphysicize it more, then return with simple absolute truths about the system you promote at its most basic levels. Not meeting whack for whack, but explain why their system is flawed and yours is not. All the way down to ground zero economically. No one who has not made up their mind about left versus right will have one clue about what you wrote above. Make it simple and true. And explain WHY it works.
I stopped reading right there.
I suppose most contemporary "intellectuals" are clueless.
Busloads of the senile, dim-witted and illiterates are routinely shuttled from place to place with 'minders' who tell them how to vote.
Pure democracy (mobocracy), which the Founders feared as much as Monarchies, has insidiously crept into our body politic, even our Constitution over the last 100 years until, I fear, the Supreme Court as presently constituted will announce it "legal." The obvious observation of so long ago, that
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."
- John Adams, Oct. 11, 1798 Address
is no longer even remembered.
Close to half of the voting population does not have the brains and minds to qualify as completely human, and "appealing" to reason is a fool's errand.
No, I don't know of a possible way to fix it in the current cultural climate, but I refuse to read the remainder of this Polyanna sermon.
This is probably the best analysis of the past election that has come out. I do have one suggestion. Look at the motivation of the leaders in the Democrat party. They aren’t socialists. They are grifters....con men. How would the Democrat voters react if they knew their Democrat leaders weren’t really interested in redistributing wealth, but in acquiring as much of it for themselves as they can? The Democrats have been using psychology and sociology and the Republicans have been using political science.
It’s past time for a grass roots GOP candidate to arise. The 2016 version is not yet on the horizon. Any known quantity (Rubio, Palin, Jindal) can be defined and marginalized. The GOP needs a wildcard in 2016...a member of the pop culture. Clint Eastwood please pick up the red courtesy phone...
We need a slash burn take no
prisioners policy
To answer the headline question: George Bush, Bob Dole, John McCain, Mitt Romney, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Mitch McConnell, Trent Lott, Bill Frist.
Where it went right: Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich, Dick Armey, Tom Delay, Jim DeMint, men who have the stomach and the desire to actually battle the liberals.
I well remember when George Bush first was interviewed about running for President. He pointed with great pride how he had “reached across the aisle” to work with Democrats. When he reached across the aisle to work with Pelosi and Reid, they gnawed his hand off and strong armed everything they wanted with no argument.
This analysis is far too simplistic and naive to pin it mainly on salesmanship. Reagan would have lost CA and the presidency with today’s demographic. Demographics is destiny. This could be good or bad depending on the cultural make-up of this new bloc of voters in the post Cold War era. Gay marriage would have been unheard of during Reagan’s time. Nor did we have the massive influx of immigration, legal and illegal, Asian and Hispanic, who don’t relate to America’s cultural and religious values. Much of Detroit is now “Little Kabul.”
In California, Orange County was the bastion of conservatism, but no more. Just look at what was once staunchly conservative Republican congressional districts (Palm Springs) going liberal. San Diego now has an openly gay Supervisor as is the Speaker of the California Assembly. No, this was a quiet revolution of culture that took place with the express if not tacit support of our RINOs and those chickens are coming home to roost with a squawking vengeance. Think Bushes’ “compassionate conservatism” and Simpson-Mazzoli amnesty among ideas to be blamed for this rot.
The Republian party went wrong in NOT dealing with voter fraud!
All it takes evil to triumph is for good men to remain silent.
And now the GOP is talking about caving on taxes and Susan Rice? They will soon be history. I have given them a lot of money over the years. Don’t think I will ever give them another dime.
And now the GOP is talking about caving on taxes and Susan Rice? They will soon be history. I have given them a lot of money over the years. Don’t think I will ever give them another dime.
"George Bush is a simple minded country bumpkin."
Maybe he is, but how would you know? Oh, I see, the main sewer media have told you. And then told you over and over. No, thanks.
Good thing the author is anonymous, as this kind of manure-spreading would damage one’s reputation if one were known!
