Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TBP

“a tax on inactivity does not fall within the prescribed functions for which taxes may be levied”

It is not so much a tax on nonaction as on the status of not possessing insurance. Which makes it akin to all manner of direct taxes, for instance the tax on having earned so much income in the last year or a tax on ownersio of property.

“nor the forms of taxes permitted.”

True. If it us a direct tax, and it is, it must be apportioned. If it is an income tax, which it isn’t, it wouldn’t need to. But it isn’t, so it doesn’t.


31 posted on 11/16/2012 10:14:07 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

It’s exactly a “tax” on inactivity. (Actually, it’s not a tax at all — it’s a penalty.)


39 posted on 11/17/2012 8:50:47 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson