Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

“Catholics” is not one thing.

11/4 at the three of our six Masses that I happen to know about, the homilies were about the primacy of the right to life over social concerns. One homily was met with prolonged applause. The others were met with approval, except that a few people walked out.

Our “youth”, university students, are strongly anti-Obama.

So I think there are demographic aspects of “Catholics” that may make generalization a little complicated.


22 posted on 11/12/2012 11:22:26 AM PST by Mad Dawg (In te, Domine, speravi: non confundar in aeternum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

Good Lord, we can’t do anything about the Catholic’s almost permanent loyalty to the democrat party as long as catholics even refuse to acknowledge that catholics vote as they do.

Even on FR every thread about the democrat voting block of the members of the catholic denomination, consists of catholics who are supposed to be conservative political activists, saying ‘nope, move away from this topic, do not discuss this’.


25 posted on 11/12/2012 11:56:43 AM PST by ansel12 (Todd Akin was NOT the tea party candidate, Sarah Steelman was, Brunner had tea party support also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawg

Demographics didn’t create a 150 year history for the Catholic vote, and demographics don’t mean much in a church that is a single church, a single denomination, under a single authority, and under a single teaching.


27 posted on 11/12/2012 12:30:48 PM PST by ansel12 (Todd Akin was NOT the tea party candidate, Sarah Steelman was, Brunner had tea party support also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson