Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/09/2012 5:46:15 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Ha! As the Clinton administration came to an end I said to myself “At least they can never again criticize a Republican president for lying. Not after all the lies slick Willy told.”

So what did we get under Bush? “Bush lied, people died.”

The left has no shame.


2 posted on 11/09/2012 5:50:16 PM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The left was opposed to war against Nazi Germany, Ut ntil Nazi Germany attacked the USSR. Then they were all for it, and indeed demanded a ‘second front’ from the US even while GB fought in Burma and Egypt, the US fought in Africa and Guadalcanal and China.

They were all for peace, so long as the US permitted North Korea to invade and occupy South Korea...

They were all for peace so long as N.Vietnam was allowed to occupy Laos, Cambodia and S.Vietnam.

They talk a lot about voter disenfranchisement, and arranged for the plan with military ballots to crash in Afghanistan.

They have no shame, and no credibility to people who pay attention.


4 posted on 11/09/2012 6:13:12 PM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Who here thinks Bush used the US military to make money for himself?

Now, who thinks Obama uses the US military to make money for himself?That’s right, my hand is up.


5 posted on 11/09/2012 6:21:21 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The left is only pacifistic when their guy is not running the war or when they secretly support the other side.


8 posted on 11/09/2012 8:44:42 PM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Conservatives must understand the “anti-war” movement has never been an anti-war movement

it is, and always has been, at its core a Marxist led and run movement, and it is used when we - our nation - is fighting Marxists, and when a non-Liberal is President and we are involved in any fighting or that President is simply buttressing our national defenses (as when the “anti-war” mmoved mobilized itself as the “anti-nuke-weapon” movement against Reagan

it is, and always has been at its core a Marxist movement against America and its core values

“wars” are just situations where the movement does not want to let a crisis go to waste

the movement has been silent during Obama’s term,

even though he did not pull our troops out of Iraq sooner than had already been agreed to by Bush, and has not pulled our troops out of Afghanistan yet, and in spite of the fact that the “Patriot Act” style measures have run even deeper (many, many more warrantless domestic searches) than under Bush, and Obama claims the right to condem American citizens to death by Executive fiat and carry it out by armed drones; etc., etc., etc

because Obama is a Marxist and one of them and it never was an “anti-war” movement; it was a Marxist political movement and “a war” being executed by any non-Marxist is a political crisis that should not be allowed to go to waste

yea, I know, tons of useful idiot Liberals join the “anti-war” movement all the time; but they are always the drones and those who merely applaud it; they do not set it up, organize it and run it


10 posted on 11/09/2012 10:28:21 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson