Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Teachers Really Need More 'Protection?'
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 11/8/2012 | Audrey Spalding

Posted on 11/09/2012 5:43:47 AM PST by MichCapCon

In its October newsletter, the Michigan Education Association wrote that Proposal 2 “…goes beyond just protecting collective bargaining. It protects the middle class and working families, giving them a chance to negotiate for fair wages and benefits and the ability to support themselves.”

Frankly, after reviewing teacher collective bargaining contracts and recent Teacher Tenure Commission decisions, it is astonishing that the MEA thinks that more protection is needed.

It is already very difficult to fire inadequate, bad or even criminal teachers. State laws specify and limit termination, and district-level collective bargaining agreements can place further limitations on teacher termination.

In June, for example, MLive reported that a teacher arraigned in Eaton County District Court for allegedly engaging in sexual conduct with male students was still employed by Grand Ledge Public Schools.

The Michigan Teacher Tenure Commission has protected a teacher who tested positive at work for marijuana and had documented cases of failing to teach (Stoico v. DPS, 2003); allowed a teacher to be reinstated though she had been found to be mentally unfit to teach (Clark v. Swartz Creek, 2009); and has protected a teacher who slapped a second-grade student and who had a documented history of using corporal punishment on other students (Okoro v. DPS, 2012).

In addition to those cases, the following limitations on teacher review and termination are disheartening — if you consider the purpose of public education to be the education of students.

At Orchard View Schools, student academic performance on tests cannot be used to judge whether a teacher should continue teaching. The agreement between the district and its MEA affiliate states:

...standardized test results of academic progress of students shall not be used in any way as valuative of the quality of a teacher’s service for retention. The Ferndale school district has a similar provision in its bargaining agreement with its MEA affiliate. Its collective bargaining agreement states that “State test scores, ratings, or other standardized test results shall not be used in the formal evaluation of teachers.”

Certainly, a teacher’s performance cannot be evaluated on test scores alone. But a complete ban on using test scores seems to have little to do with ensuring that students are being taught by effective teachers.

In the LakeVille Community School District, evidence of “a teacher’s ability, performance, or personal characteristics that are not the result of an official evaluation or disciplinary action” cannot be included in a teacher’s personnel file.

The Berkley School District actually prohibits teachers from participating in the evaluation of other teachers. From the contract:

No member of the bargaining unit can observe or make written statement of an evaluative nature which can be used in the evaluation of another member of the bargaining unit. Berkley’s provision seems designed to both limit struggling teachers from receiving helpful feedback and to protect teachers who shouldn’t be protected.

At some point, those of us not employed by a public school district have to ask, “How much more protection do you need?” In the private sector, the vast majority of employees are at-will, with the understanding that violence, drug use and incompetence are grounds for dismissal.

Teachers serve as educators and as role models for students. As such, it should be a mark of pride and professionalism to be held to a high standard. In a more professional work environment, high-performing teachers would be rewarded with more than just a single, additional dollar in pay, and on-the-job drug use and violence would be considered grounds for automatic dismissal.

TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: schools

1 posted on 11/09/2012 5:43:50 AM PST by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Teachers have become destroyers so why wouldn’t they beg to be protected. They know that they are fast becoming an enemy of those of us who love our children.

What kind of a person would send our daughters to some PP website so they can brag about what happy sluts they’ve become?

2 posted on 11/09/2012 5:53:47 AM PST by formosa (consider me galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

With all the sex with underage students going on, I would hope their using protection.

3 posted on 11/09/2012 6:01:42 AM PST by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon a husband of a special education teacher, I would just settle for teachers and aides being protected from violence by students—administrators turn a blind eye as long as the district gets money...

4 posted on 11/09/2012 6:28:35 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson