Replies

G -

This is the first election I’ve ever seen where the numbers just don’t make sense - where they are outside what I thought possible. But if it really was egregious enough, then it will be documentable.

In that case, I’ll buy you lunch, and laugh at taking you out to the wood shed in my post when I myself was 6% off in my calculation of the popular vote.

I’m just quicker to believe that the inevitable demographic monster has arrived than that D’s could muster a 2 or 3 million vote heist. But I’ve been wrong before ... as my predictions about the election itself prove.

Here’s how I’ll phrase it: I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised. I’ve never seen an administration more adept at botching ill structured cover-ups (and never seen a media so willing to make up for it.) The very brashness of everything they do is a reflection that they believe the electorate to be incredibly stupid and uninterested - so they don’t seem to do much to cover their tracks until it’s too late ... at which time the Executive Orders start rolling out.

So - I will fly to wherever you live and buy you lunch if this gets legs enough, not such that some congressman’s son gets busted on YouTube for not falling far from the tree ... but a serious vote fraud story where the documentation of fraud is way stronger than the rumor (as with the fake but true Bush/Rather story,) the story either documents or guarantees that it indicates millions and not hundreds, and breaks through to the MSM as a real story questioning the outcome of the election. There is enough money out there that if the story has legs, someone will pay to support researching it. After all, Mitt’s out of a job right now, and he has some capital on the side.