Wow. All that debt generated so little growth. And The Fed wants to buy over $1 trillion in Fannie, Freddie, Ginnie MBS.
To: whitedog57
Romney’s got a horse.
And a dog on the roof!
Oh, and lady parts.
Don’t bug me about facts, man.
To: whitedog57
...and that is what Democrats call a ‘good investment’.
3 posted on
11/08/2012 8:44:12 AM PST by
STYRO
(Do not accept unconstitutional government as legitimate government.)
To: whitedog57
"Real" GDP growth = Nominal growth - inflation.
But the inflation calculations are so @#($%$*-up that I have no trust about the "Real" GDP growth.
4 posted on
11/08/2012 8:45:23 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
To: whitedog57
It didn’t generate any growth. All the growth would have happened anyway. What it did was prevent greater growth.
6 posted on
11/08/2012 9:04:18 AM PST by
webheart
(King of the Run-On Sentence)
To: whitedog57
“The 45% Increase in Debt Under Obama Generated Only 7.1% Real GDP Growth”
The title is a contradiction. There is nothing real about GDP that comes as a result of Borrowed Debt. It is not real because it has to be paid back. It is simply pulling demand forward at an even greater loss to the future.
7 posted on
11/08/2012 11:00:50 AM PST by
Revel
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson