Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

This just doesn’t compute. Vote cheating doubtless was one reason. But Obama got FEWER votes than he did last time. And Mitt Romney got far FEWER votes than McCain, even though McCain was a lousy candidate, too.

Romney was even worse. He pulled out all the stops attacking his fellow Republicans, but he did very little against Obama. He “won” the debates mainly because Obama was completely unprepared for the first debate. But there was nothing impressive about Romney in the debates.

The numbers tell the story. Millions of people who should have turned out to vote did not, because they refused to vote for Romney.

Was that their fault? No, it was the pundit’s and GOPe’s fault for ONCE AGAIN putting forward a candidate that the base didn’t want. You’d think they’d learn after about 10 times, but they’d rather lose than put anyone into office who refused to go along with their corrupt, pork-laden program.


27 posted on 11/07/2012 10:07:17 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

No no, you are all wrong, says Lindsay Graham. LOL


63 posted on 11/07/2012 2:18:40 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I thought that Mitt won the nomination because the conservative vote was basically divided between several candidates-Cain, Perry, Santorum, Gingrich.


65 posted on 11/07/2012 4:01:30 PM PST by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson