Your position on the substance of the actual events here is a sufficiently extreme rejection of the substantive evidence that no one is really paying much attention to you. You are so far off reality that the general consensus is that you are probably a Zero supporter and engaged in attempt to defuse the effort to smoke out additional hard data.
To be fair, the pictorial image manipulation and attempted identification of relationships based on images is not a reliable method of achieving proof--although in Zero's case, his skin color and features are very much like his mother and her family.
However there is now a fairly substantial body of hard information out there that constitutes a pretty conclusive rejection of virtually all the elements of the fairy tale and supports an alternative story that will be seen at some future date.
“You are so far off reality that the general consensus is that you are probably a Zero supporter and engaged in attempt to defuse the effort to smoke out additional hard data.”
Straight-up Alinski tactic, David.
You presume to know that there is a FReeper “consensus” that I am probably a Zero supporter?
You, David, have taken the lead in calling the U of WA’s SADO transcript a forgery when it is obviously cross-corroborated “hard data.” If Corsi dared to put up a forged State of WA archived document of the President’s mother online don’t you, who have claimed to be a lawyer, IIRC, believe that an Obot member of the WA bar, U of WA legal department or Law School, not to mention the DNC lawyers eager to get even for Corsi’s successful Swift Boat attack on Kerry...don’t you think there would be a stampede to haul Corsi into court for defamation and forgery?
I would think that Obots would be especially keen to get Corsi since his overwhelming proof that SADO attended U of WA from the fall of 1961 to the spring of 1962 DESTROYS OBAMA’s LITTLE FAMILY narrative. This narrative about the little family cherishing the dream of the US civil rights movement was the foundational myth behind Obama’s progressive holiness.
I sure would be a big failure as an Obot if I were to conclude that Corsi was correct in this instance and affirm it at every opportunity, wouldn’t I? Now you and Fred Nerks are the ones who appear to be trying to protect Barry by seducing FReepers into making fools of themselves by buying the Mal-Val narrative of Malcolm X as dad and Valerie Sarruf throwing gullible FReepers totally off the likely birth of Barry in Kenya, doubtless providing amusement at DU.