I'm sorry, bit I don't get it. This seems like it was miss stated or confused in who is being addressed. Is he talking to Obama? If so, it doesn't make sense because he has no sons. It seems like the statement should have been that his opponent has produced more sons than he has jobs.
If he is talking to Romney it might make sense, but it isn't clear ...maybe it's reference to five sons compared to six or eight jobs. Maybe it's just me, but the comment is so confusing I don't find it that funny. It's like all those emails I get that say, "This is the funniest joke ever" -- I've stopped bothering to open them.
Exactly. And Romney has produced at least one job.
But it’s never good when your opponent has produced more sons than you have jobs..”
Sons than jobs, sons, get it now?