1 posted on
10/16/2012 10:41:46 AM PDT by
Harley
To: Harley
THe discussion merely moves from “Did Obama cover things up”, to “Why is the president clueless about his own foreign policy”?
That’s a great game to play. Why did the president need 3 days to study his own foreign policy so he could discuss it at a debate?
Why didn’t the President or the Vice President have a clue about what happened in the terror attack on our consulate? How could they possibly have prepared a military response contingency (standard for a terror attack) if they had no idea there was a terror component for 3 weeks?
To: Harley
Now do you all see that all democrats are a cult? Hillary is jumping on the sword for the Muslim Marxist Obama, for the bigger cause, their cause of socialism.
3 posted on
10/16/2012 10:48:41 AM PDT by
rurgan
(Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
To: Harley
She took “responsibility” but blamed “security professionals.” This is a Clinton trained at Yale Law School—read the carefully parsed statement. Hillary is saying the same thing Biden said in the VP debate. A lot of supposedly sphisticated commentators and analysts are falling for a ruse.
5 posted on
10/16/2012 11:10:10 AM PDT by
SC_Pete
To: Harley
Clinton is taking responsibility for nothing more than showing up for work. Mid level bureaucrats will take the blame. She is not 'falling on' any 'sword'. Please, let's not take the spin so seriously. The most important aspect of all this is that she actually said that obama knows nothing. It aint his job. Well what the hell is his job then? He was hired to do something, but I guess his own responsibilities have not been satisfactorily explained to him.
It's OK to let him go.
To: Harley
9 posted on
10/16/2012 12:15:12 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson