National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist Richard Tisei

Mass Resistance ^ | Oct. 15, 2012

[EternalVigilance]

The Republican establishment in Washington is pouring enormous amounts of money -- over a million dollars -- into Massachusetts to elect an aggressive, anti-family homosexual activist to Congress.

In Massachusetts, Richard Tisei is known as an openly "gay" liberal Republican politician who ran for Lt. Governor in 2010. Prior to that as a State Senator, among other things he worked to successfully block the people's right to vote on the Marriage Amendment.

Tisei is the only Republican Congressional candidate in Massachusetts to receive such support from the national Republican Congressional campaign! Flood of expensive TV ads

Anyone watching TV in Massachusetts has undoubtedly seen a flood of television ads which support just one particular Republican challenger, Richard Tisei, mostly through attacks on the Democratic incumbent, Rep. John Tierney (6th District). The ads are impossible to miss, and easily dwarf all the TV spending in all the other Congressional districts in the state.

The Republican National Congressional Committee (RNCC) has picked Tisei to be one of their so-called "Young Guns," an elite group of 30 US House challengers being touted as "the new generation of right-wing House Republicans who are looking to put their conservative stamp on Washington." (We're not making this up.)

The RNCC and its super PAC Young Guns Action Fund have already spent nearly a million dollars for hundreds of 30-second ads on behalf of Tisei, and many more are planned.

[DrewsMum]

I have a question for you.

Why didn’t you enter the Republican Primary?

We NEEDED a constitutional conservative choice.

Where were you?

[EternalVigilance]

I left the GOP in 2008 when they refused to count our votes in the Iowa Caucus.

I knew then the process was completely rigged.

It’s taken a bunch of other people, folks who didn’t seem to care what the GOP did to us back then, a bit longer to find out that the process is rigged against them too.

[DrewsMum]

Fair enough. But knowing that’s where the majority of Conservatives were, wouldn’t it have been easier to join the primary and at least get some exposure and give the Conservatives a better choice than we were presented with than to wing it as a third party? Also, another question, had Rick Santorum won the nomination (or Bachmann, or another one lined up with your values), would you still be running now?

Thank you taking the time to answer my questions.... I’d love nothing more than to support a freeper, but I have serious questions.

Also, when did you decide to enter the race?

[EternalVigilance]

As recently as last year, we weren’t really at the stage of development of America’s Party where we felt ready to engage at the presidential level. But I decided to run during the holidays last year, when it was becoming more and more apparent that Mitt Romney was likely going to be successful at buying out the Republican Party.

It seemed highly likely to me that no one was going to be saying what must be said, in terms of the principles that we must return to if we are to survive as a free republic, or concerning the creation of any sort of political process that is actually of the people, by the people, or for the people.

Turns out I was correct.