I hope some attorneys will consider what the writer is suggesting. It would be great if Obama and Democrats would be responsible for eliminating abortion.
1 posted on
08/25/2012 7:17:51 PM PDT by
kathsua
To: kathsua
It would be great if Obama and Democrats would be responsible for eliminating abortion. I doubt that. They revere their machinery of racial extermination. They are not about to let such a thing happen.
To: kathsua
I have been thinking along this line for quite some time.
Once you accept that the Government can dictate which medical procedures are allowed or not under the terms of insurance, what is to prevent a future Administration from deciding that abortion is inimicable to the health of women (or merely elective in most cases)?
Liberals are too f&^king stupid to see this of course.
3 posted on
08/25/2012 7:25:34 PM PDT by
Lysandru
To: kathsua
The ruling is based on a philosophy of limited government that is closer to the normal views of those called "conservatives" than to the views of those called "liberals".
Huh ? Wade was Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade, representing the State of Texas - as in a States rights issue. Not even close at all.
4 posted on
08/25/2012 7:25:55 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(Obama -> Ransom "Rance" Stoddard)
To: kathsua
The source is NOT Townhall.
5 posted on
08/25/2012 8:02:53 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(Chosing Ryan = a choice between two dramatically divergent views of government spending & taxes.)
To: kathsua
For example, a Republican president might be able to sharply limit the medical procedures associated with abortion.
_________________________________________
Well that wont be Willard Romney...
He signed the RomneyCare legislation in MASS that included $50 abortions...
He swore he would not overturn Roe V Wade
He swore to “protect a woman’s right to an abortion”
He said that if parents wouldnt give theuir permission for their under age daughters to have an abortion he would get the judges to overrule parental authority...
To: kathsua
I'm going to leave the tedious process of examining specific comments by the Justices to those who get paid to do such things. I'm more interested in the general theory involved. Those "tedious specifics" are derived from the general theory involved. And in the case of the Roberts decision, they specify that Obamacare is imposed only on corporations, not natural persons.
Some people call that tedium. Some people call it freedom.
But most people remain silent, and hold their breath.
How Chief Justice Roberts Saved America
8 posted on
08/25/2012 9:11:10 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: FReepers; Patriots
10 posted on
08/25/2012 11:27:41 PM PDT by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
To: kathsua
The author uses a lot of words, yet misses the most basic point. Obamacare requires that all medical files be submitted and maintained in a federal database. This one requirement eliminates the supposed “privacy” established by Roe.
Yes, Obamacare legislatively overturned Roe. When I point this out to libtards, their heads explode.
11 posted on
08/26/2012 5:17:43 AM PDT by
CSM
(Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson