[righttackle44]

I appreciate your analysis--and I want to stand a cheer. It is easy to agree with your points--and I must admit I didn't get the Ginsberg thing right away after the ruling.

However, does it matter at all what the Supreme Court says and does in these days--someone above making the point that Republicans and Conservatives putting our destiny in the hands of a couple of geriatrics?

Here is why I ask: The Supreme Court ruled on Arizona's SB 1070, striking down most of it, but leaving the provision that ". . .requires an officer to make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there's reasonable suspicion that person is in the country illegally." {Quote from the Arizona Republic.]

This week, a shrieking female attorney, Karen Tumlin of the National Immigration Law Center is back in federal court--in the court of one of Obama's favorite thug federal judges, Susan Bolton--screaming that a new injunction MUST be issued. And Susan Bolton, the federal judge, is considering it. Even, I think, looking for a way to issue the injunction.

So there it is: Supremes say one thing; Bolton the thug judge threatens to ignore them.

What think?

[BreezyDog]

Thanks but not my analysis. I thought it was so good I copied it to email yesterday but forgot to copy the screen name of the poster.

Bolton would be breaking the law. Not that that's a big deal to the lefties. Just more judicial activism. I would draw and quarter her. :-)