There has to be Dems in tight elections not happy about this, there's much to lose and very little to gain.
Bring it on DNC, this will be interesting to watch now that you are schmoozing with jihadis.
Natbe Nidal can speak via satellite.
Or, Morsi, in Arabic, from.....Al Azhar.
Or, the head of CAIR.
0bama could lead a prayer.
The Muslim putsch. The guy I spoke of several times, years ago, from film on Fox, must have been right. “You’ll see. We’re going to turn the White House black.....” (the color of Islamic revolutions).
Then, there’s the whole 0bama, Ayres and Farrakhan walking in together to vote. 2008
“...he at least had to give his approval.”
You gotta think the candidate at the top of the ticket has a lot to say about the convention.
I did read today, regarding the R. convention that the “platform belongs to the party” not Romney, but let’s face it nobody but political junkies like us talk or care about the platform.
But, as to what’s going to be seen on TV, I’m sure those candidates have full veto power over it. The Presidential candidates are the ones who will really be judged based on their party’s convention.
Give his "approval"???
More likely he's following orders -