[JustSayNoToNannies]

Hmm ... OK, so some argue that for tactical reasons Mitt is more of a threat than 0bama. I may not agree with that, but it's not - as mouse1 claimed - "insane." (If anyone claimed Mitt was further left than 0bama, that would be insane.)

OK not “insane” enough for you? Look around you.

Look where exactly - and for what?

[JustSayNoToNannies]

Kevmo says only, "Romnuts [...] appears to me to be more liberal than Bill Clinton" (Clinton seems to be generally agreed to be significantly less liberal than 0bama) - and OldEarlGray hasn't posted on this thread at all, and in his brief posting history has never said Mitt is more liberal than 0bama (who he has called "the Marxist").

If anyone is "insane" around here, it's not them.