[brent13a]

Well holy geez, whoa, I didn't know I had impugned your delicate sensibilities enough to start some childish namecalling, of which I never initiated.

You originally posted up above:

And how many years has prostitution been legal in Nevada with few negative consequences?
Sovereign States. You know, 50 of them joined together in a Union yet capable of making their own laws as a Sovereign State!

That was posted by itself in what appears as a direct response to other posters questioning the UN's decision to issue such a decree to the world.
I guess I was just way out of line for assuming that you're blanket statement (that was put out there with no other context) was just you somehow aligning your libertarian viewpoints on prostitution and state sovereignty with the UN.
Obviously, now that I look back, there was much deeper meaning and contextual relevance to your original statement above. I mean, reading your original statement by itself directly after reading the OP's article obviously makes complete sense.

[philman_36]

I didn't know I had impugned your delicate sensibilities...
I don't have delicate sensibilities.

...some childish namecalling, of which I never initiated.
Childish comments are deserving of childish name calling.

What you did do was imply I said something that I hadn't.
That is what I took offense to.

Obviously, now that I look back...
And yet you took offense at my reaction (childish namecalling as you put it). Your actions, IMO, were worthy of much more and yet I refrained.
Are you a "roll over and take it" type who expects everyone else to react in the same manner?