“So you no longer hold that “you cannot eliminate a single element of extra-constitutional government intervention - you have to get rid of all of them”? “
Read it again. It might seem complicated to you, but it’s actually in complete congruence with your own stated position on the Constitution. However, if like many stoners, you are doomed to not be able to follow a concept from beginning to end, you could misunderstand that statement. You have done exactly that.
“”a sign of brain damage to the reasoning center of the brain.” is not a question. “
You are right. That was a statement of fact.
When I said “What was it? a bad batch of ecstacy? Pesticide in your hookah?” You’ll note is actually 3 questions.
You can count the number of question marks to be sure (and I only used one question mark per question - to keep it easy for you)
You must have missed them.
“No.”
So why can’t you track the conversation properly? I was really counting on it being ecstacy, but I suppose it could be any number of things. Which was it?
So you no longer hold that "you cannot eliminate a single element of extra-constitutional government intervention - you have to get rid of all of them"?
Read it again. It might seem complicated to you, but it’s actually in complete congruence with your own stated position on the Constitution.
Wrong as usual - my stated position is this:
"I’d never hold one Constitutional limit hostage to another as you advocate. [...] I want all Constitutional limits obeyed - unlike you."
I was just asking you a question, it wasn’t a personal attack.
"a sign of brain damage to the reasoning center of the brain." is not a question.
You are right.
So there's your personal attack. Glad you finally own up to it.