You keep on being the "Establishment Republican"'s pawn, and the GOP won't be any different than the
From Limbaugh Lexicon Terms Defined: Rio Linda, New Castrati and the GOP Establishment
RUSH: Edison, New Jersey. Hi, Phil, you're next. You're on the air. It's your big show biz break here.
CALLER: Hi. Thank you for taking my call. My wife and I are avid fans and listeners.
We're confused about something.
RUSH: Yeah?
CALLER: You quite frequently use the term "Republican establishment" and we think we've kind of figured out what that is
and the fact that they represent pretty much the moderate wing of the party,
that for some reason or other seems to be doing harm to the conservative wing.
But we think we might be able to understand this better if you can identify for us who represents it.
Who are the individuals in the party?
RUSH: Ah, this is a nice trick. I knew this was coming.
Phil, you're a smart guy. You're a crafty guy.
Phil knows the answer. Let me just tell you, folks:
- Phil knows exactly who the Republican establishment is.
He wants me to name names
- 'cause he wants them called out.
CALLER: Well, yes, because I think when you can identify specifically, it helps.
For instance, let's say Reverend Wright.
It heped me to understand, and my wife to understand, the dangers of Obama
because we were able to specifically hear the message of Reverend Wright.
RUSH: Okay I'll give you a name. I'll give you a Republican name. CALLER: We're thinking McCain and others like that,
but I think it's important enough to know:
- Who is this establishment?
Who are these people?
RUSH: Well, wait a second. I understand what you're saying.
I think it's the really important to define it correctly, too.
A Republican establishment member in the media would be David Brooks in the New York Times, the so-called conservative columnist.
- He's basically a moderate.
He favors big government if run by the people he thinks are smart.
He's not crazy about conservatives.
They are in favor of big government for the most part.
They think campaigns on smaller government are losers
and they worry that, if they succeed, there's going to be less of an opportunity for them to have jobs in government.
They're basically people who don't think we have a spending problem and that that's great.
If they get in charge, they'll do some things to reduce it
but they really don't believe government is the big problem like conservatives do.
They're establishment.
They're government-establishment types.
They're DC establishment.
That's the center of the universe.
It ain't over ... till it's over.
We don't have to chose, until our time comes to chose.
I'm going to do the best I can with the time I have, to expose Willard for the RINO he is.
But I will not support a RINO, no matter what!
The "Establishment Republicans" are a worse enemy than the Communists, because they tear us down from the inside.
We have to vote for who we want to vote for, and ignore the LAME Stream Media's constant drumming for LOSER MITT.
They want MITT because he's the easiest to defeat.
Look what Rush said (5th paragraph from the end) about what the "Establishment Republicans" think Mitt's chances are.
" But let me just close this out by saying
- the Democrats have insisted for 75 years that Social Security is an insurance program
- that you are contributing a percentage of your paycheck into your own account,
- which is part of a trust fund, to pay for your retirement benefit.
it is not an entitlement program.
- It is insurance.
Like an annuity program.
Meanwhile, every argument they are making now strips bare the big lie that they've been telling for 75 years.
If this payroll tax cut is a tax cut, then Social Security is not an insurance program.
And yet we're gonna run around and let them have it both ways
- because we're afraid of the optics
or we're afraid because Obama's African-American?
and the money people are having withheld from their paychecks
- is not an insurance contribution, then it's a tax. Pure and simple.
- and all of a sudden now we're cutting taxes on this program?
The money people are having withheld from their paychecks is not an insurance contribution, [it's] a tax, that's what they're telling us now?
Okay, then you are being taxed to pay for somebody else's retirement.
Now, the fact that the Republican establishment cannot make that case and other arguments
tells me that they may have already surrendered,
- and this is a big difference between us and the establishment.
I said on Greta how many times,
a lot of people inside the Republican establishment secretly don't even believe Obama can be beaten.
And that's why they want Romney,
- 'cause they think at least Romney will help 'em take the Senate.
He'll lose less down the ballot than Gingrich or some conservative will.
and you haven't given up,
and you don't want to accept this propaganda from the left.
We insist on challenging it, we insist on fighting it
- 'cause there's no other way to save the country,
and continually playing these games
- letting the Democrats rewrite the language, change the definition of things,
get away with false accusations against us, never do anything about it,
constantly stay on defense. "
Read the following:
- Newt Supporters Aren't Swayed, January 26, 2012
The GOP Establishment in Abject Panic: They Don't Understand Their Own Base
Newt is a Vessel: He Won South Carolina Because He Articulated Conservatism
Newsmax/InsiderAdvantage Poll: Gingrich Man to Beat, Tuesday, 29 Nov 2011 04:20 PM
- "WE SUPPORT NEWT, OR SANTORUM!
HE CAN BEAT OBAMA SO BADLY ... , IT'LL BE THE SHOW OF THE CENTURY"
It'll be a fight against the "Establishment Republicans" to the very end, and it may even go into a Brokered Convention.
Like Ronald Reagan said:
" We must go forth from here united,
determined that what a great general said a few years ago is true:
- " There is no substitute for victory, Mr. President. " "
How many times has the "Republican Establishment" treated us to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”?
After we elect and RE-elect the "Republican Establishment", they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail.
It may be worth it for the GOP to lose some elections - if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.
If we didn’t know it before, WE ... the Tea Partiers, now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.
Ironically, we can thank the "Republican Establishment" for impressing this so indelibly upon us!!! I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.
Now the "Republican Establishment's" hatred for conservatives is well known.
Jon Bershad wrote about Rush's analysis of their PANIC.
My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none.
But my ... LOATHING ... for the "Establishment Republicans" ... is even stronger!
The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!
