Are the new drapes EVER gonna get here???
Posted on 06/05/2012 10:04:00 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Amen, Brother FReeper. And good tagline.
I hope you, and other fellow FReepers, will seriously, prayerfully, consider my candidacy.
Understand that I have no illusions that the third party candidate I vote for will win. At this stage of the game, my SOLE PURPOSE for casting a third-party vote in the presidential would be to weaken the victory of the winner. But I am praying for a miracle to happen to where I can cast my third party vote for a worthy candidate who could WIN and bring limited government conservatism into power.
Will definitely consider voting for you! Thanks for the link and thanks for stepping up to the plate.
Are the new drapes EVER gonna get here???
|
Are you still killing your unborn? -- GOD |
You are an idiot. I wish you happiness in that special little world that you and your fellow useful idiots inhabit. All 25 of you.
We've listed some civil, thoughtful alternatives and views here with regard to Romney, we've raised some pretty good questions that you COULD choose to address to salve our concerns, but this is the best you can come up with? Hurling insults?
Could it be because other than Obama Hysteria, recounting the nightmares that might come to pass in a worst-case scenario, you cannont defend the indefensible?
Those of you hovering on the fence, I suggest that the behavior this guy is reduced to should be a clue. Your common sense is telling you to spit Romney out. Follow it or you might end up like this guy who is intellectually so bereft that he's reduced to, "You are an idiot," etc.
Just who are you going to vote for (if you vote at all)? You realize your next president is going to be either Obama or Romney? (Well, maybe you don't.)
Here is what my common sense -- which has served me quite well for many, many years -- tells me. Romney can at least -- however unlikely -- be won over to our side on some issues. Why? Because his bad policies are based on *ignorance*. Which can be corrected.
President Obama, on the other hand, will *never* be won over to our side. On any issue. His destructive policies are not based on ignorance -- they are based on malice. His sole purpose is to bring this country to its knees. There is no rationalizing with him; there is no compromising with him.
You see no difference at all between a typical, ignorant RINO pol and a committed Cloward-Piven Marxist, hell-bent on the total destruction of the United States. It's stunning. Absolutely stunning.
Gee ... I've only answered that question in specific DETAIL numerous times on this thread. Do you actually read the posts??????
If that is all you have to say, I guess you didn’t read my post either.
Not as stunning as the revelation that you think poor Romney isn't a bad kind of statist socialist authoritarian (clearly you are a stranger to his actual RECORD) -- it's just that his policies are based on ignorance! He'll listen to us!
Yeah -- ignorance he has had before and after the days he publicly distanced himself from Reagan. I'll say one thing for you, your own "bad policy" of thinking Romney won't fight conservatives harder than he'll fight the Democrats who like his "policy," can only be based in ignorance -- ignorance of Romney's feet-on-the-ground RECORD.
Your gullibility is stunning.
Maybe you can quote from my post where I said anything remotely similar to that, you illiterate prick.
When a few posts earlier, I wrote:
I'm voting neutral in the O v R race and casting my vote for an official on-the-ballot third party presaidential candidate -- it's the ONE THING I CAN DO to help the limited government Republicans and conservatives I'll be voting for everywhere else on the ballot. My third party vote will have zero impact on whether Obama or Romney gets the White House, but it will, in its small way, contribute to weakening the victory of whichever statist wins.
I hope at least 25% of Americans disgusted with statist authoritarianism in BOTH parties vote third party in the presidential, because if Obama or Romney only wins on, say, a 38% plurality where 62% voted AGAINST him, he'll enter office on the defensive and politically vulnerable. The smaller his plurality, the better the chance for our limited government Republicans to battle him successfully.
CLEARLY you didn't read it or you wouldn't have asked the question, because it addresses specifically all three things that you wanted to know.
YOU are a typical representation of the caliber of "thinkers" who want sensible Americans to vote for a nut candidate.
WTF cares?
Your religion hobby horse is beneath the noise level in 2012!
Gladly:
Romney can at least -- however unlikely -- be won over to our side on some issues. Why? Because his bad policies are based on *ignorance*. Which can be corrected.
I think most people would say an accurate assessment of that is that Romney is only a socialist because he doesn't know any better. But I'm forgetting -- if you're not familiar with his record, you have zero comprehension of the things he's actually DONE that are things done only by statist socialist authoritarian types.
Yeah, you're a *real* thinker, all right. Romney might be the shits, but did it occur to you that a President Romney wouldn't betray our national security secrets the way Obama is now? Wouldn't unilaterally cut by 75% our nuclear arsenal, the way Obama is planning to do now? Wouldn't use our military to help bring the Muslim Brotherhood into power in Libya, Egypt, and now probably soon Syria, the way Obama has been doing now?
*NO* difference at all between Obama and Romney? And you pride yourself as a "thinker"?
Between horrible and deadly, I'll choose horrible.
What ELSE can a MORMON do;
when their target fails to be intimidated?
Ma'am; we tried those once; but we got nowhere.
We'll stick with our bikes. Thanks anyway.
Me too!
Vote to OUST the Obamanation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.