[ml/nj]

The research done was meticulous and undeniably convincing.

BTW, when I say something like this I try to provide a link to the "research."

ML/NJ

[little jeremiah]

I just pinged butterdezillion and asked her to post a link. I have no idea where in her comments the info is; it was discussed voluminously a long time ago. If her blog is still up (and someone else had one as well), hopefully the link will show up on this thread.

Shows that in order to keep track of research one needs to read a lot as it is posted.

[Ladysforest]

“The research done was meticulous and undeniably convincing.”

“BTW, when I say something like this I try to provide a link to the “research.”

BTW - here is the link to the research:

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth

Images straight off the actual microfilm viewers in Honolulu AND The Library of Congress. There are tons more that are not posted on that as well.

One of the more interesting things we found? That in the 1960-1964 General Birth Index book in Honolulu, the official date range is missing in the book. It IS in all of the other Index Books, just NOT in the book that contains obama’s entry.

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/03/06/its-a-date/

All the material was collected IN PERSON. This is how we were able to be certain of the veracity of our research.