Why do so few, if any, remark on the inanity of the whole idea of gay marriage? Pat Buchanan came close today on Megyn Kelly’s show, but he seemed hesitant to take the last step. What’s more ridiculous, more illogical, more fanciful than a “marriage” between two persons who are incapable of mating? Whose “union” is and always will be unproductive? If we’re willing to change the meaning of a physical, social, religious state that has existed far longer than the two millennia with which it’s usually credited, what other meanings are we likely to accept? To put it simply, gay marriage isn’t simply an abomination, it’s an impossibility, an absurdity; and no-one’s saying it!
It’s turning people’s relations into a sex toy slavery institution.
It is rather insulting to black people, but, whatever, if it is a black man doing it to a black man... or a muslim in chief doing it to black people...