He was president of the Harvard Law Review, not editor. Editor involves writing skills, and since Obama didn’t have Bill Ayers, a team of speechwriters, or TOTUS with him at Harvard, being editor would be unlikely. He held a largely ceremonial position, and actually never wrote an article for the review.
Disagree with me all you want but I sense the ground is shifting under our feet and the country as a whole is coming round to the idea regarding 0bozo of - “enough”.
I don’t for a moment claim that most of the lies will be exposed by the MSM. But I sense that the country has tired of the act and is ready to move on.
Maybe I’m wrong - I hope I’m not.
FYI - Listworthy? Is this new news?
Ping - speculation in article, but see posts 40, 45, 49, 59
self ping
2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or STAND TRIAL FOR insurance FRAUD.
I followed he links in there article and none of them provides any documentation for this charge. This is something I've been looking for documentation on for a long time, indeed, ever since I read about it here on FR. It definitely looks possible because the quotes from the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission website make it look like she was forced out of the bar on a "resign or be fired" basis. Does anybody have any real documentation for this charge?? If so, please post it. Thanks.
This is very strange. He said he just paid off his student load, then he surrenders his law license shortly thereafter, why?
I went to your posted Liberty.com website and found that the rhetoric he posted was taken directly from another blog (which he linked to and which also offered the disclaimer of "rumors").
And when I did a google search on "Michelle Lavaughn Robinson" I found literally tons of other blogsites echoing the very same thing but none of them providing the actual facts surrounding the loss of her license...........or Obama's for that matter.
So while it's nice to believe the worst from the first couple, I'm not offering any of this up for argument in a room full of liberals until I have ALL THE FACTS...........
Will read later
Michelle Obama’s original page on this iardc website has been scrubbed. The original one found in 2008 reported court ordered suspension. I placed the link here awhile ago.
Devvy reported it I believe. Let me see if I can find the old link.
MICHELLE OBAMA ON “COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS”
First off, the biggest ass-kissing media refers to Michelle Obama as a ‘distinguished attorney” despite the fact that Michelle Obama has been”inactive” since 1993. Click here: ARDC | Lawyer Search
ARDC - Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
Click to enlarge image. Everyday another Obama skeleton comes careening out of the closet.
This ADRC is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. It is COURT ORDERED...not “Michelle Obama ordered.” Their website is very clear about their function and why they step in. (see below)
If this was a Republican, the Democrooks would have her up on charges already.
Schmoo, an attorney, points out, “sounds more to me like she was drummed right out of the practice of law. I am just dying to know what she did... she ran to have a court ordered inactive status done...and then no malpractice report needed to be provided.
She wanted this to ‘go away” fast and furious and the details not come out in depositions, courtroom documents, rulings for the client/plaintiffs...etc..
I would love to know what she did. I believe barack obummer himself was also disciplined—I know his law license is on “inactive” he lied about ever going by any other names when he applied for bar application. He also failed to state any prior drug use...(which he admitted in his books...and he had outstanding tickets that were never paid).”
Michelle Obama on court ordered inactive status with the Illinois State Attorney hat tip schmoopett
huh?
Michelle Obama is on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS—order said since she has been placed INACTIVE that “no malpractice record required.”
WHAT DID SHE DO THAT in 1993 — AFTER only 4 YEARS — HER LICENSE to PRACTICE LAW WAS REVIEWED AND PUT ON INACTIVE by a DISCIPLINARY AGENCY?
What Is the ARDC? (this is NOT the Illinois Bar-where one can voluntarily be inactive) As our name implies, the ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.
This is Michelle Obama’s original link before it was scrubbed. http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=138873458
Here is Devvy’s article.
I wonder how many of the mindless mouth pieces giving their commentary about the “wonderful, smart First Lady,” know that in 1993, Michelle Obama, was ordered by the Illinois Supreme Court to stop practicing law? The faux First Lady was ordered by the court; it was not her choice. (Click here). The records are sealed by the court so we don’t know why, but I am told by lawyers sending me email, it had to be something major for such drastic action.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd430.htm
But the circumstances surrounding Michelle's surrender - which the author of the posted article alleges to be part of settlement of a matter in which she would otherwise be charged with insurance fraud - have not been documented, in so far as I've seen. If a judge forced her to surrender, would there be a court record of the proceeding? (Yes, I know the Obamas excel at making inculpating evidence disappear.) And if no such record exists, is there any alternative evidence for his allegation?
I'm no fan of either of them and maybe I'm missing something here, but this blogger should have at least some evidence to back up his statements.
This story, coupled with Øbama's known deviant predilections, may just give fresh meaning to the 'Deep Thrøat' moniker.
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. (or II) was on the receiving end of the following complaints from fellow members of the bar:
(1) He never reported using the alias,"Barry Soetoro," (or Soebarka) or possibly several others"
(2)He failed to report traffic violations
(3)He failed to report Drug Use.
This is fairly heavy-duty stuff among the legal-beagle pack. Michelle seems to have made a serious, but IMHO,a somewhat more forgivable mistake: i.e., she appears to have believed a client, who was in fact, committing major insurance fraud.
Underlying both cases, it seems undeniable that both of these Affirmative Action wunderkinden were absolutely lousy lawyers! In point of fact, neither of them worked on very much legal stuff at all. Again, Michelle has a bit more actual legal work experience and product than Studley, even if she was never entrusted with anything too complicated or serious!
One more point: Obama "The Constitutional Law Professor:"
He was an adjunct instructor ... nothing more. To top it off, it was a political appointment, which required very few hours and little work. To ice the crap cake, he was absolutely lousy at that, too.
Of the two, Michelle might actually have a shot a reinstatement. Barack, never. As is quite common in Bar Association housekeeping, they were allowed to "surrender" their licenses, rather than face disciplinary hearings.