Skip to comments.
Now that the Buffett tax is dead (or is it?), what was it based on?
Orange Punch, The Orange County Register political commentary blog ^
| 4-18-2012
| Mark Landsbaum
Posted on 04/18/2012 10:29:38 AM PDT by Mark Landsbaum
Defeat in the Senate of the class warfare bill known as the Buffett Rule, gives conservatives something to crow about, liberals something to whine about and the president something to campaign on in his reelection campaign. The latter was probably the intention all along.
But the almost religious desire to soak the rich has become pathological among Democrats and leftists. Two ballot initiatives in California would pile on, and you can bet we havent heard the last of Barack Obama singing the praises of disproportionately taking money from people who make more than you do.
Whats behind this, other than the obvious covetousness, greed and envy, so cleverly called the progressive tax?...
(Excerpt) Read more at orangepunch.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: buffetrule; obama; redistribution; taxes
To: Mark Landsbaum
i'm all in favor of taking money from the rich but only after they're dead, and even then I wouldn't give it to the government.
You can see the difference between a real conservative point of view and that of the democrats.
Again, one more time ~ Democrats want to strip live rich people of their last penny and give it to the government. Conservatives are happy to let them die first, and then take it for themselves, or the heirs ~ and never for the government.
Obviously these two points of view are incompatible!
2
posted on
04/18/2012 10:36:19 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(ue)
To: Mark Landsbaum
Now that Buffet is down and out, lets hear it for a new rule where rich people who use tax loopholes to pay a 20% tax rate, voluntarily write a check for another 10% of their income to the IRS
Hey, let’s call it “the obama fairness tax”!
3
posted on
04/18/2012 10:38:03 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
To: Mark Landsbaum
Click the Pic!
4
posted on
04/18/2012 10:43:33 AM PDT
by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: Mark Landsbaum
If Mr. Buffett or any other "1%-er" feels that they are not taxed enough, they are perfectly free to make a donation to the United States Treasury for any amount they choose.
What they're saying is that they want to pay more, but must have a gun to their head before they'll do it?
5
posted on
04/18/2012 11:05:12 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
To: Mark Landsbaum
A: smoke, mirrors, and a PR campaign
6
posted on
04/18/2012 11:33:27 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(Steyn: Obama sez: "Nice little Supreme Court you got here. Shame if anything were to happen to it.")
To: Mark Landsbaum
Can anyone explain why the Senate held a vote on the so-called 'Buffett rule' (a tax increase), when it was not voted on in the House? I thought all revenue bills were supposed to originate in the House, and be approved by the House before a Senate vote.
Am I missing something?
7
posted on
04/18/2012 12:13:42 PM PDT
by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: Yo-Yo
Standard Oil was originally Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. The state of Ohio passed an income tax that only taxed persaonal income over $1,000,000 per year. The only person in the state that qualified was JDR. He then moved to New York which had no personal income tax.
Money moves to where it is welcome. Now many wealthy New Yorkers make their legal residence in Florida.
8
posted on
04/18/2012 12:23:08 PM PDT
by
ozdragon
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson