Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lockbox

Hunting deer in the woods and hunting humans in battle is vastly different.

Deer hunters will be vastly under-equipped against a battle-hardened military.

It’s a nice mental exercise, but the chances of all this happening are nill to zilch.

Obumbles can hire all the IRS agents he wants, but if the SCOTUS says it is unconstitutional, Obumbles can issue every damn exec order he wants and it will mean squat.

You think that the 26 states plus Virginia will allow the implementation of orders that have been declared unconstitutional? The AG’s of those states and Cucinneli, who is a vicious pitbull of a constitutional defender will just throw it out.

Even the democrats in the judiciary won’t stand for that type of arrogance.


21 posted on 04/16/2012 5:37:58 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: OpusatFR
Is this the same military that's doing such a bang up job in Afghanistan after 10 years............

1. You assume that the enough members of the US Military would follow illegal orders to attack their country.

2. You forget that a majority of deer hunters have military training and still believe in their oath to protect and defend the US from all enemies foreign and domestic.

3. I'll take a .308 over a .223 any day.

4. Let's use the Afghanistan kill rate of 30:1 which leaves 100,000 dead military out of 565,463 active duty US Army.

6. So one state and the US Army has lost 1/6th of it members, plus the loss of those not following illegal orders. So the question becomes what will the Army due in the other 49 states?

29 posted on 04/16/2012 6:27:31 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson