Isn't that the $64 question.
bump
...it's called the 2nd Amendment and if the US Congress fails to impeach and then remove from office any president guilty of such a blatant high crime as an unconstitutional and premeditated refusal to respect the constitutionally enumerated powers of our highest court, that fail-safe mechanism must and WILL be initiated!
Popcorn & ammo are ready.
ping
Obama will transform into a real life Queen of Hearts,
“Off with their Heads!”
I would speculate just what or why he is in doing in South America, land of organized kidnapping.
Due to inflation since Obama came to office, we now must consider the "$72.32 question."
Until it is overturned, I will expect the Supreme Court to uphold obamacare.
Sadly, we might be shocked when the verdict on 0bamascare. I’m afraid the Supreme Court will buckle under to the usurper like all the other crooked judges. Take notes. This is how dictators are made, even in “the land of the free”.
Obama will not OPENLY defy the Supreme Court order, because that would be political suicide a few months before the election, considering 60%+ of voters want Obamacare struck down. What I would expect him to do is what he has done when he didn't get his way on other parts of his agenda like "Cap and Trade" and "Card Check" is quietly "back door" as much of it as he can through a combination of executive orders and agency rule-making. That is what he has done with "Cap and Trade", the EPA has issued a rule to regulate CO2 even though congress has refused to pass a law. Same deal with "Card Check", it died in congress but now Obama's NLRB is trying to claim they have the power to impose it without congressional consent, through agency rulemaking powers.
The best indicator of the future is past history.....
Obama has ignored fed Judges orders on ObamaCare already, so why wouldnt he again..
He see’s himself as this era’s FDR-—add that to his anti USA side, and one can see he will take “action” against the SCOTUS....
I’d say the Secret Service agents home from Columbia should be assigned to the SCOTUS conservatives.
Actually, while the SCOTUS is indeed powerless to force the president to do something, in this case, they are not trying to force him to do anything, they are, and can, blocking both appropriations of money from congress and any and all legal enforcement powers based in Obamacare from the bureaucracy.
And while Obama can indeed divert money to Obamacare for a little bit, that is it. The money dries up at that point. If the IRS hires people to enforce Obamacare, once the diversion of money ends, they are fired, because there is no more money to pay them.
More importantly, if a bureaucrats then says that “Because of Obamacare, you have to buy this!”, you can tell him to peddle his papers, and there is nothing he can do to make you. The law becomes unenforceable.
A few questions and comments.
If the USSC rules against the Muslim in chief (as they should), and given the messiah’s tendency to ignore the Constitution and Congress, just who the hell will stop him, arrest him, put him in handcuff where he belongs? Remember, many of the scum in congress during the Clinton era are still in office and were included in those 500+ FBI files and those certainly silenced many Dem & GOP voices.
If the USSC judges are so wonderful and smart, (they are not), as we have been told by our politicians, why do they need months to verify if the Constitution allows this crap sandwich which nobody in congress fully read?
After years of communist indoctrination at our law schools and years of sitting on various judicial benches and being touted by various presidents as so brilliant why do we still have an almost endless string of 5-4 decisions?
There are only a few possible answers to the question above.
1) These are just political hacks willing to ignore our rather simple and short founding documents and the owner’s manual known as the Federalist Papers for nothing more than political ideology.
2) They are not Supreme Court Judge material and are ignorant of our country’s founding and the reasons behind our Constitution.
3) They are even more ignorant than suggested in choice #2 and really believe that our founding document can be changed by case law (Odumbo and gang believe this) and are never challenged with the question: “Hey douche bags in black robes, if the Founders intended the Constitution to be altered simply by case law, why the hell did they create the slow, deliberate Amendment process? There is not a single piece of lawyer scum in this country which can answer this question without lying.
I truly believe that we on the right have greatly aided the Leftists in the destruction of our country. I couldn't believe how many FReepers joined the Lefts chorus in trashing our candidates (e.g. Bachmann, Cain, Perry). Some of these same people are now bitching that we're left with Romney as our presumed candidate. Sorry, hold some responsibility in this!
We conservatives need to take a good look at ourselves. We hold at least a portion of responsibility for where we're at today. We've made the job of the Leftists that much easier. The negativity and doom and gloom that permeates these threads is the Lefts dream come true. We're dooming ourselves. Self-fullfilling prophesy is a bitch.