you can tell by the questions being asked by the judges which side they are biased towards
it’s hilarious to think the only time to insure the validity of a candidate is after they’ve been elected.
that is patently absurd
and to think that the state has no say in the validity of a candidate presented to its citizens is to make the states irrelevant.
if the states are irrelevant, then why are the votes of the citizens within the states required at all?
The judges look (and act) like something out of a Dilbert comic strip.
Not with people who want you to pass a 2,000 page bill to find out what's in it.