[LibLieSlayer]

Sorry... Newt was talking about progressive incrementalism through left wing judicial activism... you know... not following the Constitution and what is written in it or reading the Federalist Papers for guidance in original intent. What Newt was talking about was prostituting the document to twist and bend what it says to fit a GODless conclusion... like the (NON) right to abortion and a mythical right to privacy... neither of which exists... or ignoring things like the 10th and 14th Amendments! obamao is talking about fdr styled communist subversion through legislating from the bench... and YOU should understand this and also know the differences.

LLS

[RitaOK]

Nicely put, both of you.

Russ, the “will of the people” is wrapped up too often in their ignorance of the Constitution, thus we have Obamao as our president, by the will of the people.

Nothing in his background should have so swayed the will of the voters to elect him, but for their own ignorance.

Grant it, the same can be said of particular justices also, so I get where you are coming from. The crazy old one demonstrated her own ignorance a couple of weeks ago during oral arguements, when she didn’t know the law she was discussing, it had been decided in reverse of the actual decision. Sheesh.

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

Ref post #3.

You are correct.

The idiot who wrote this article cannot read. He did not understand what Newt was saying...or didn’t want to understand and just wanted to be nasty. I think it was he can’t read and understand.