1 posted on
03/22/2012 4:01:49 AM PDT by
JOHN W K
To: JOHN W K
If the government can force you to buy health insurance, it means they own your body, not you, and you are just renting it from them.
2 posted on
03/22/2012 4:05:58 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: JOHN W K
CCW morphing into CW II..
3 posted on
03/22/2012 4:17:07 AM PDT by
mo
(If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
To: JOHN W K
Oh bullshit... this bitch just interpreted a clause that negates the entire document... this is why I negated fox.
LLS
4 posted on
03/22/2012 4:24:33 AM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!)
To: JOHN W K
Superb analysis of the necessary and proper clause by Randy Barnett
here.7 posted on
03/22/2012 4:47:32 AM PDT by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: JOHN W K
11 posted on
03/22/2012 5:17:01 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
To: JOHN W K
"Necessary and proper" to carry out a specific power. The Constitution allows the Feds to raise armies and navies, which is why they can conscript people into the military, or require employers to reemploy, with no loss of seniority, those who volunteer to serve. Both are "necessary and proper" means of raising troops, which is a specified power.
What specified power is Obamacare "necessary and proper" to carry out?
15 posted on
03/22/2012 5:54:32 AM PDT by
Pilsner
To: JOHN W K
Liz WIel is a dolt. Never liked her on BORing’s show....Her constitutional scholar creds are more than suspect
16 posted on
03/22/2012 5:56:08 AM PDT by
Nifster
To: JOHN W K
As with any court ruling against this administration, it will be a bump in the road that they ignore, as they proceed to destroy this country.
Throw the bastard out and rebuild this nation!
17 posted on
03/22/2012 5:56:11 AM PDT by
G Larry
(We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
To: JOHN W K
VEEE can do anything.
ANNNEEEETHING!
VEE are the ALL-POWERFULLLLL GUMMINT!!!!
BOW DOWN, YOU CHURLS!! WORSHIP USSS!!!!
OR ELSE!
18 posted on
03/22/2012 6:03:06 AM PDT by
Flintlock
(Photo ID for ALL voting. Let our dead rest in peace!)
To: JOHN W K
Wiehl is correct, although completely wrong when it comes to the intent and meaning the founders put into the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Go back well over 100 years and it’s easy to find multiple cases where Congress and/or the USSC has taken the position N&P basically removed all limitations upon the federal government allowing them to legislate whatever they wish on any given day.
I was more confident on the commence clause argument failing than Necessary and Proper not passing USSC muster.
24 posted on
03/22/2012 6:51:13 AM PDT by
Brytani
(Liberals - destroying America since 1776)
To: JOHN W K
This is utter BS. Does the government have the right to tax at 100% rate all the money above $ 50,000 that an individual earns? Would the Supreme Court agree that this law is right if it passes?
33 posted on
03/22/2012 12:19:31 PM PDT by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson