If he just sat there for four years while the rest of us cleaned up the mess, it would still be an improvement.
It does sum up his support fairly well. A large number of people want someone they believe they can trust first and foremost.
I don’t get it! Most folks don’t give up on Hollywood, would never part with their TV, and don’t seem to give a hoot about what their kids are exposed to at school.
They have no problem absorbing the culture.
But with Gingrich and Santorum, you are right, they are under the microscope.
"What about Santorum? Is adultery worse than lying, greedy and unscrupulous politics that was called “unprincipled” by the backbone of the Tea Party in Pennsylvania in 2006? Does talking about “religion” make him any better of a person than Jim Bakker, Ted Haggard, or Jimmy Swaggert if his personal example of declaring he is a principled, pro-life candidate while not just endorsing – BUT CAMPAIGNING FOR an openly pro-partial birth abortion candidate?
Why does that make Rick a more “righteous” candidate? Or have ANYTHING to do with skills it takes to be President? Or getting elected?
I’m confused, is the title referring to Politijim?
Are you Jim’s wife by chance?
What amazes me is you can’t see how shallow his arguments against RS are. I read part one of his anti RS post and thought i was reading any lib newspaper.
Nothing against Newt at all but this guy is a light weight.
Its sad when someone votes based only on religion. Presidents are also CIC and policy setters...Voting for christian religion only, gave us Jimmy Carter, a born again christian that confessed he lusted in his heart once for a woman....bam, that got the religious voters big time and we all know how his presidencey turned out....I am not against Santorum, I was for Cain, but being president is not the same as voting for the pastor of your church...as we all found out with Carter....
I thought conservatives weren’t supposed to engage in group think. She has a different opinion than you. So what?