And, by the way PSYCHO, some of the Rats coming over to vote may be voting for Romney or some may be true conservatives (AKA Reagan Democrats).
That may be true. What I saw in Michigan were Democrat strategists (Joe DiSano), and liberal radio show hosts (Tony Trupiano) organizing Democrats to vote for Rick because they thought he’d be easier for Obama to beat. The local news interviewed Democrat after Democrat after voting that day. None were actual Santorum supporters. They were hardcore Obama supporters.
My question is do you have any numbers to support your suggestion?
“My question is do you have any numbers to support your suggestion?”
********************************************************
Do you mean this “suggestion”: “And, by the way PSYCHO, some of the Rats coming over to vote may be voting for Romney or some may be true conservatives (AKA Reagan Democrats).”?
I guess you missed the words “...may be...” in that sentence? I’m not going to pick some imaginary “numbers” or percentages out of thin air or out of my posterior like any number of posters in this thread have done. The bull-Scheiß here is already waist deep so I don’t want to add to that.
With last night’s results I see more of the “inevitability” of Romney’s nomination evaporating away and, to me, that’s a GOOD THING. Others here apparently are experiencing it as a DERANGEMENT THING—which is mystifying to me.