Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Timber Rattler

—Her’s was a private vote. —

No it wasn’t. Once she said who she voted for it became a public vote and a form of endorsement. Maybe not an endorsement speech at a rally, but an endorsement nonetheless.

And that is why she said who she voted for. If she had remained silent about who she voted for, it would have been a private vote and there would have been no endorsement implied.

This is quite black and white, and it all rests on whether she made her vote public or not. i.e. Private vote = not an endorsement. Telling people who you voted for (with no other clarification) = endorsement of the person you voted for.

And Sarah would be an idiot if she thought telling people who she voted for would not influence anyone. I’ve talked with her at length. She is no idiot.


30 posted on 03/07/2012 5:06:03 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf
I’ve talked with her at length. She is no idiot.

I never said she was. But her voting for Newt is not going to change a thing for him. Did he win Alaska last night?

He's done.

52 posted on 03/07/2012 6:30:25 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

So if she is asked whether her vote was an endorsement and she says no, then.......


59 posted on 03/07/2012 10:40:47 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson