Skip to comments.
Hoyer says Fluke should sue Limbaugh over 'slut' comments
The Hill ^
| March 5, 2012
| Pete Kasperowicz
Posted on 03/05/2012 10:14:14 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
I thought comedians and entertainers were exempt from law suits.
2
posted on
03/05/2012 10:15:26 AM PST
by
Kenny
To: Free ThinkerNY
Yeah, Steny. Discovery for that case ought to be a real hoot and a holler.
And, of course, the truth is an absolute defense against libel.
3
posted on
03/05/2012 10:16:17 AM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(No surrender.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Sarah Palin should sue too, she is not a public figure, she holds no political office, and Bill Maher and David Letterman both said disgusting, vile comments about her ad her daughter..so Hoyer, should the Palin family sue too?
To: Free ThinkerNY
If he proves she’s a slut does he win the case?
5
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:11 AM PST
by
Walmartian
(An update is available for this tagline. Click here to download.)
To: Kenny
Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t recall Sarah Palin suing the 100s of Democrat operatives/media hacks that slandered her and her family four years ago. They were going after the kids. Were there any lawsuits?
6
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:15 AM PST
by
madison10
To: Free ThinkerNY
She became a public figure the minute she opened her mouth Hoyer. Now sit down and shut your darn mouth you bloated ignorant socialist scumbag!
7
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:25 AM PST
by
mardi59
(I'm not looking for MTV, I'm looking for MVP. Newt 2012!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Up until the point where she started appearing on tha lame street media, she may have had a case. But with her constant media appearances, she may have become a “public figure.
8
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:31 AM PST
by
offduty
To: Free ThinkerNY
Bring it bitch...
DISCOVERY
will be your worst nightmare!!
9
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:32 AM PST
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: Free ThinkerNY
I’m sure Rush’s full time staff of some of the best lawyers in the nation would have a fun time crushing Ms. Fluke into paste.
10
posted on
03/05/2012 10:17:51 AM PST
by
apillar
To: Free ThinkerNY
Hey Steny, when is a political activist NOT a public figure?
11
posted on
03/05/2012 10:18:10 AM PST
by
Fireone
(Gingrich/West 2012. (did I mention FUBO?))
To: Free ThinkerNY
To: Free ThinkerNY
She is not a public figure She made herself public talking about her pubic.......
13
posted on
03/05/2012 10:19:06 AM PST
by
dragonblustar
(Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
To: Fireone
She is indeed a public figure...see Post 12
To: Free ThinkerNY
he said Fluke is a "slut" and a "prostitute" She could easily win. She's a disgusting floozie, as described by the first term, but she's not a prostitute - she apparently doesn't charge her (claimed) many customers directly.
15
posted on
03/05/2012 10:19:38 AM PST
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“She is not a public figure” = she made herself one when she testified in front of that so-called committee and lied. Birth control pills are used MAINLY for birth control not other ailments as she claimed. Ask any reputable doctor.
Discovery is a bitch, Steny. Probably more than she cares to have known about her. And besides, most people would probably agree that $3,000 in birth control in 36 months = slut.
16
posted on
03/05/2012 10:19:43 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: Free ThinkerNY
She made herself a pubic figure by testifying before Congress.....
To: Free ThinkerNY
If she does, she better make sure she isn’t a slut. Rush can afford top legal representation. And we know good attorneys are not going to turn away the money and the limelight.
If she has anything at all out there that isn’t glowing, it would be proof that she really is a slut.
18
posted on
03/05/2012 10:23:52 AM PST
by
dforest
To: mardi59
pros·ti·tute (prst-tt, -tyt) n. 1. One who solicits and accepts payment for sex acts. 2. One who sells one's abilities, talent, or name for an unworthy purpose. tr.v. pros·ti·tut·ed, pros·ti·tut·ing, pros·ti·tutes 1. To offer (oneself or another) for sexual hire. 2. To sell (oneself or one's talent, for example) for an unworthy purpose. The second part of the definition suits her quite slut [slʌt] n 1. a dirty slatternly woman 2. an immoral woman Again, definition 2 fits. Don't worry about Fluke. The MSM is over playing their hand.
To: kcvl
“””And besides, most people would probably agree that $3,000 in birth control in 36 months = slut””””
Slut???? Try porn star.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson