1 posted on
03/04/2012 6:46:37 AM PST by
Salgak
To: Salgak
all for it....the wife would disagree, however.
2 posted on
03/04/2012 6:50:54 AM PST by
BudgieRamone
(Everybody loves a bonk on the head.)
To: Salgak
Oh Lordy! LOL! You would be tied to a stake and burned for this one if you were Rush saying this! (I do like your sense of humor though?!) :)))
3 posted on
03/04/2012 6:51:50 AM PST by
marygam
((Hurry November 2012, we might not make it))
To: Salgak
You can demand sex from Fluke all you want.
Me? I’m not into bestiality.
4 posted on
03/04/2012 6:57:03 AM PST by
bolobaby
To: Salgak
I've just gotten new glasses, and I've seen her pictures. Thanks. But no thanks. I'll remain single, celibate, and sane.
I have no desire to get a set of creepy crawlies.
/johnny
To: Salgak
I think it would be very kind if we allow Henry Waxman first try, providing he pays his taxes. Helen Thomas can be second.
6 posted on
03/04/2012 7:10:14 AM PST by
mardi59
(I'm not looking for MTV, I'm looking for MVP. Newt 2012!)
To: Salgak
I’ll have to pass on sex with anyone who wants free contaception. STD’s are not on my bucket list.
7 posted on
03/04/2012 7:19:08 AM PST by
Conspiracy Guy
(I voted Republican, no Conservative was on the ballot.)
To: Salgak
8 posted on
03/04/2012 7:22:03 AM PST by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas gerit ;-{)
To: Salgak
I hope you don’t apologize like Rush did.
To: Salgak
NO. It goes like this. If you are on government supplied protection, and then you get pregnant, then the government (taxpayer) has to pay for an abortion. Which will not be optional.
10 posted on
03/04/2012 7:35:36 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Salgak
Mmmmm...taxpayer subsidized sex....huuurrhg...
11 posted on
03/04/2012 7:36:24 AM PST by
Caipirabob
(I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
To: Salgak
After all, the current system discriminates against the ugly, the fat, the shy. . . . Which is why we have the INTERNET.
(How about that for an evil thought?)
12 posted on
03/04/2012 7:43:40 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Salgak
I was going to register a website name along the lines of sendthatslutatwenty.com but I don’t want to encourage that (her) kind of behavior ...
As it stands now, after watching ABC/talking head show this Sunday morning:
Democrats: 1
Babies: 0
Republicans: Tied up in knots
So sad for out Republic ...
15 posted on
03/04/2012 8:25:46 AM PST by
_Jim
(Conspiracy theories are the favorite tools of the weak-minded.)
To: Salgak
Man, that’s kind of dumb, no offense. How about forced contraception of all liberals?
To: Salgak
Put it this way: if we are paying for contraception for her (thereby allowing easier "access") -- are we creating an easement?
Cheers!
17 posted on
03/04/2012 8:52:15 AM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Salgak
I most definitely would NOT hit it.
Not even with two tax payer funded glad trash bags tied around my...nevermind.
18 posted on
03/04/2012 8:56:25 AM PST by
chris37
(Heartless.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson