Posted on 03/03/2012 7:02:42 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
“argumentum ad populum”
I don’t know about lurking. I stop in from time to time. When I see Obot spew I... I smell ‘em a mile away. Hate can be a virtue. How about that :)
In my view the eligibility issue is THE issue. Culture war, roger. Private individual seeking presidency refusing to ID himself... RED ALERT!
I don’t know about lurking.
Lurking, basically, is the stage one goes through when they're first turned on to FR. Someone comes to just "look around". Some continue to just "lurk" by merely reading articles and replies choosing not to become involved in the debates and conversations. Others jump right in or only spend a small amount of time lurking.
Your reply indicated something...That was an attraction...
Was, not is. Past tense, not present tense. (even small things do get noticed)
In my view the eligibility issue is THE issue.
IMO it is the most contested issue despite the lack of media coverage. @It's Alive. (LOL that's so bad of me on so many levels)
In my book the gradual erosion of Constitutional principles ranks pretty high. Without those principles everything falls apart.
Yeah, I know. That's a big umbrella and many things fall under it, yet they're all pretty important.
Dude. That has to be missing a sarc tag.
Bagged one myself, a little while back. :)
It's not gradual any more, though.
Good riddance to the Obot but I cannot take credit alone for that zot. These Freepers were instrumental in outing him as well:
Brown Deer;philman_36; PA Engineer; Godebert and anyone else that I missed. He’s been a thorn in the side since he joined and proceeded to defend Barry Soetoro.
Believe me, you’re already being watched just by the comments you’ve already made.
____________________________________
Oh yea! Not so much for the comments but the entire history. Who were almost all of the posts made to and what were they about? Tag team? One and the same? or neither. Just bears watching. Anyone that comes to FR and only posts on the BC threads, especially if they are defending the issue should be an immediate suspected troll in my opinion.
If you guys are insinuating that I’m associated with Harlan, let me assure you I am not.
Anyone, such as Harlan, who makes excuses by whatever willy-nilly rationalization is needed at that moment to support “Obama” refusing to properly identify himself, is an enemy.
As for my replies being mainly to him, of course they were. CQC is like that.
I don’t know Harlan. He was unprincipled. I can’t stand that.
Man, my reply stands on it's own. I'm not insinuating anything. Does it look like I've got a problem speaking my concerns? I don't think so.
I'll give anyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've got no problem with you so far other than that, IMO, you might need a little directional mental push to get you to look at things differently. You seemed to have taken what I said seriously.
As I said, in the end, time will tell and your words will speak volumes.
Have fun, Ray. C ya around.
I could never associate with Harlan for at least two reasons.
1) His argument was not premised upon principle, merely an outcome. People might disagree, but at least have a principle to defend.
2) The apparent goal was the acceptance of the subordination of our Law to Obama’s will.
Until we meet again.
Amen! I’ll try to do better next time sir! :)
I have heard about two white women who helped Barack Obama Sr. get to the United States, but I have no details on the veracity of this claim. I have NOT heard of a woman missionary helping Stanly Dunham leave Kenya. Unless someone's got something worthwhile evidential wise, I would ignore such a story. There are people out there who make stuff up, then promulgate it as though it were true.
That is an excellent summation. However, Harlan did have principles (of a sort). They were far left moonbatty principles, however, so he had to keep them under wraps. That’s why it looked like he stood for nothing (other than the elevation of Obama’s word/will above all else): because he was a mind-numbed/self-lobotomized lefty attempting to ‘pass’ on a conservative site.
You call ‘em as you see it and I’ll use my years of dealing with people to call it as I see ‘em. I have some experience with sorting fact from fiction. In obama’s case much is up in the air. Let’s throw in the Axelrod connection and the personally reported fact that someone in Russia had an inkling about Obama being groomed in the 1980s to become POTUSA.
Thank you all for taking out the trash—Harlan1196.
This guy had “Obamanoid” written all over him. He was a one issue seminar poster from the first day he posted on here—1/28/12.
Anyway, you all did a great job of exposing him and parrying with him. He tried to best you but utterly failed.
I’m sure there will be others. Well done!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.