So this is how a judge does his job? Just makes it up as he goes along?
So “Your Honor”, would you have approved the Death Penalty?
Just like Judge Michael Malihi, who ruled that Obama is eligible to be on the Georgia ballot even though there was no probative evidence of eligibility offered and both Obama and his lawyer showed contempt for the court by not showing up.
It was a sharia ruling based on “judge’s knowledge” in Georgia, and this is a blatant sharia ruling in PA as well - not even bothering to hide what it is.
In both instances, credible evidence was simply ignored. “Judge’s knowledge” overruling evidence that actually complies with the judiciary’s evidentiary standards.
Malihi also ignored Supreme Court precedent and instead relied on a non-binding opinion of an Indiana court. I just posted that we cannot allow a precedent like this PA judge’s ruling to stand, because the way Muslims get sharia into free places (such as Britain right now) is by setting precedents in local areas that are easily corrupted, and then having other areas use that precedent.
It’s exactly the same process for getting a stolen identity (like Obama did). You steal a birth certificate number from a dead baby, and then with that forged document you get other documents that are actually genuine. The nation is only as safe as its WEAKEST LINK. And using those weakest links is what Muslims do. They’ve demonstrated it time and time again. Anytime we just poo-pooh a weak link because we all know it’s a corrupt or weak link, we are leaving the door WIDE OPEN for unscrupulous players to take over the whole system.
And the Muslims who believe they have a duty to kill infidels are unscrupulous.