Footnote 4.
"definition of this clause has been the source of much debate. See, e.g.,Gordon, Who Can Be President of the United States: The Unresolved Enigma, 28 Md. L. Rev. 1 (1968); Jill A. Pryor, Note, The Natural-Born Citizen Clause and Presidential Eligibility: An Approach for Resolving Two Hundred Yearsof Uncertainty, 97 Yale L.J. 881 (1988); Christina S. Lohman, Presidential Eligibility: The Meaning of the Natural-Born Citizen Clause, 36 Gonz. L. Rev. 349 (2000); William T. Han, Beyond Presidential Eligibility: The Natural Born Citizen Clause as a Source of Birthright Citizenship, 58 Drake L. Rev. 457 (2010)"
Cites recent publications which is usually a red flag because of liberalism infiltration. Go from 1950s and back are likely to much more credible about NBC.
Looking at one cited book above by Jill Pryor ,as I recall, she is a leftist Dem living in Atlanta.
http://www.jstor.org/pss/796518
Infiltrated liberal thought permeates the country - indeed.
In 1829, William Rawle wrote in A View of the Constitution of the United States, "every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity." So the Arkeny- Malihi view is not new.