IOW the judge followed existing law PROVIDED the defendant was born in a state (or protectorate exception) of the USA.
This is just affirming there are only two types of citizens not three. Now the plaintiff is free to appeal.
Is this another Orly Tatz case?
It appears somebody made the judge an offer that he couldn’t refuse.
Law of the jungle applies now. Every man for himself.
Here is another about natural born citizen released on November 14, 2011. The source agency is the Congressional Research Service.
http://www.legistorm.com/score_crs/show/id/82388.html
One thing it says “There is no provision in the Constitution and no controlling American case law to support a contention that the citizenship of one s parents governs the eligibility of a native born U.S. citizen to be President.”
I haven’t read as much as others here, but I thought I would bring this article to attention.
The argument is jus soli.
Can you imagine ANY of these judges standing before the Founding Fathers and pulling this crap?
I can’t.
Shame on them. Shame.
Dissappointed but not surprised.
Obama and his lawyer knew this all of the time. The fix was in. That’s why they didn’t show up.
It will be 50 years before history shows us the truth.
How. Does. The. Judge. Know. Where. He. Was Born?
Did he see an original document?...
Or some scan from the interwebs?
obama will not be voted out. Even if the unemployment numbers don’t look good, his propaganda media will make it look good. Or they will manufacture some crisis and derail the election if it looks like obama is losing the race!
The only way is for the candidates to expose his ineligibility and prosecute him!
This is the last straw!
The GA judge just rules that he is nbc because he is born in Hawaii!
Never mind his bc is proven to be fake, never mind authenticating it! obozo intimidates all of them. They will never do the right thing! There is no way out except to have the candidates exposing him. Romney, Gingrich, Santorum need to gang up on Obama and challenge him in public to prove that he was born to 2 US citizens or get out of the WH!
We need to yell out to them at their campaign stops to demand that they expose obama’s ineligibility! There is no time to waste!
This election is just for show!
GOP couldn’t care less if they win. Or they won’t push Romney!
If Romney really wants to be president so badly he can do it very easily by exposing obama! He will get our undying love too if he does that!
We the people are so stupid and timid. We are just taking it from the criminal in the WH. We have exhausted all means. We cannot rely on the justice system to remove the criminal in the WH. We need to have a ‘velvet revolution’!
Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, if you truly are the leaders, lead us in removing the usurper!
I have heard this as well from a different source.
b s
bologna sandwich
Does this mean that the next president will not be appointing Orly Taitz to the SCOTUS?
How can Judge Malihi both dismiss the Plaintiff’s exhibits for their failure to follow standard rules of evidence, and rely on that same material to assert that Obama was born in Hawaii? The “birth certificate” introduced was stated to be a copy of a false document, purportedly pulled off the internet, as evidence of forgery. It lacked any semblance of an official seal or chain of custody that would allow the court to rely upon it as a credible birth document. Malihi’s opinion depends on his assumption that Obama was born in the US. Where was valid evidence of this presented to his court? (Though two Plaintiff’s foolishly stipulated to this “fact” sans evidence in an attempt to be clever, the attorney in the third case did not, which means it would have to be proved in court). But as many suspected all along, you can’t beat a rigged game.
Taking this country back is going to be hard work indeed.
I guess this means the check cleared.
In reading Malihi’s ruling, he appears to be explaining that Ms Taitz failed to “Daubert qualify” her expert witnesses. Without Daubert rules compliance, testimony and evidence offered by expert witnesses can’t be considered to be a finding of fact by a trier of fact. I was introduced to the Daubert rules during my Texas child custody jury trial in 2001 (I won after 19 hours of deliberation) right after the SCOTUS ruling establishing the Daubert standard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_standard
quote
In 2000, Rule 702 was amended in an attempt to codify and structure elements embodied in the “Daubert trilogy.” The rule now reads as follows:
Rule 702. Testimony by Experts
If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.
(As amended Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000.)
All hope is lost. May I never visit an eligibility thread again. I’m glad I didn’t contribute any money to the cause, but I’m frustrated with myself for burning so much time on it.
It is now a settled matter (not justly, but settled), and no court in the country will reverse that course.
Those here and elsewhere who claim that there is still unpublished evidence out there against Obama held by people who are just waiting for the right moment, are either cruelly wrong or they hate this country and justice as much as any of Obama’s apologists. The moment has slipped away.
This is why I stopped paying attention to these birther lawsuits. Regardless of merit, it ain’t gonna happen. It’s like Charlie Brown thinking this time Lucy won’t pull away the football.
ping
Gingrich has pledged that he will clean up the judicial system. Here is a chance for him to show he means it -
In GA, obama shows utter contempt to the court in the ballot access challenge. He failed to show up as ordered. He went around the court to pressure the SOS!
This is a nation of laws. NO ONE is above the law. Obama has been utterly contemptuous towards our laws!
Gingrich must blast obama’s lawlessness! If he is too cowardly to hold obama to his lawlessness he is not serious about revamping the justice system!
Please write to Gingrich. All he has to do is, at the next debate, cite the fact that obama shows utter contempt to the court by not showing up as summoned on 1/26/12 to show why he should have access to the GA ballot.
NO president has ever shown such contempt for the court/law!
Gingrich will get standing ovation for doing that! And shock them all!!!