Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rational Thought
Doesn't matter. Iowa is ancient history.

Santorum should follow Huntsman's lead and drop out before SC.

4 posted on 01/16/2012 6:12:52 PM PST by newzjunkey (Imbecilic early voters doom us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

“Santorum should follow Huntsman’s lead and drop out before SC.”

Why would one of the winning candidates drop out? And would the winning candidate then turn around and endorse one of the losing candidates? Does this make sense?


11 posted on 01/16/2012 6:55:15 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Why should Santorum drop out when he has more delegates and votes than any of those he might help by dropping out? Why should he give Romney the victory as many of Santorum’s voters will stay home from the primary in disgust? If those supporting Santorum had been willing to vote for McNewt, they would have gone for him in Iowa and elsewhere when he looked to be ahead, ie, the day of the Iowa Caucus.


15 posted on 01/16/2012 9:34:21 PM PST by Ingtar (If the GOP wants my vote, they should start fielding candidate for whom I can vote - Jemian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Exactly. Why should Santorum drop out and endorse a loser while he has more delegates as well than any of the other candidates running. Where is your logic?


20 posted on 01/16/2012 10:32:16 PM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson