YOU HAVE NO PROOF, not one single item of provable fact that the technology is fraudulent.No, but I don't have to "prove" he's a fraud. It's up to him to prove that he's legitimate. He isn't even close to doing so.
You have faith in Rossi, which has no place in scientific enquiry.
When Rossi fulfills his promise to provide an E-Cat for independent testing to the University of Bologna, and if they determine that it really works...
OR
When a real, verifiable, legitimate company, university or other credible organization announces that they have an E-Cat and it works as described
THEN
I'll believe that Rossi is legitimate.
Until then, the very long and detailed list I've provided on numerous occasions provides more than enough evidence to believe that Rossi continues to be a con man, as he has been for decades.
Another clue, since you apparently have none. Rossi doesn't have to do a damned thing that either you or I might wish.
"You have faith in Rossi, which has no place in scientific enquiry."
I've told you repeatedly that the above is NOT true. But you just keep repeating it despite that fact.
"I'll believe that Rossi is legitimate"
I don't give **** what you believe or don't believe.
"Until then, the very long and detailed list I've provided on numerous occasions provides more than enough evidence to believe that Rossi continues to be a con man, as he has been for decades."
Nope. As I said, your VERY CAREFULLY SELECTED list proves only that you are very selective in your beliefs and link only to that information that supports your point. Your information on Rossi's fraudulent activities appears to come from a single source in Italy. This sort of selectivity is the hallmark of a propagandist, not a person who is out to "find the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth".
There is a "meme" which actually better explains more of the factual universe surrounding Rossi and his technology than your interpretation. The meme is "misdirection".....he wants to keep the publicity up, and people interested, while keeping enough of his potential competitors off balance and out of the market, and, if possible, send them off on various "wild goose chases" while he gets the bugs worked out of the real piece of technology he has.
As I recall, you and some others on these threads claim to be motivated by a desire to "keep widows and orphans from being taken in by a scam". Here is your actual moral position......those who have impeded the development of LANR over the last quarter of a century have KILLED PEOPLE. People whose lives might have been saved if they had had access to inexpensive power (even just heat). You might want to invest some time thinking about that.