I said nothing about his credibility at any level. What the witnesses said was that he was knowledgeable.Yup, that's the difference.
You don't care about his credibility, aboveboard, colorable, conceivable, conclusive, creditable, dependable, determinative, honest, honest to God, imaginable, likely, plausible, possible, probable, probably, rational, reasonable, reliable, satisfactory, satisfying, seeming, sincere, solid, sound, straight, supposable, tenable, thinkable, trustworthy, trusty, up front, valid (to use all the synonyms you just had to stick into your post).
That says everything anyone needs to know about your beliefs regarding Rossi.
You don't care about his credibility, aboveboard, colorable, conceivable, conclusive, creditable, dependable, determinative, honest, honest to God, imaginable, likely, plausible, possible, probable, probably, rational, reasonable, reliable, satisfactory, satisfying, seeming, sincere, solid, sound, straight, supposable, tenable, thinkable, trustworthy, trusty, up front, valid (to use all the synonyms you just had to stick into your post).
That sounds like it, awesome.
Let's just say they're a little ahead of their time...
Elephant Talk lyrics.
Talk
it's only talk
Arguments
agreements
advice
answers
Articulate announcements
It's only talk
Talk
it's only talk
Babble
burble
banter
bicker bicker bicker
Brouhaha
boulderdash
ballyhoo
It's only talk
Back talk
Talk talk talk
it's only talk
Comments
cliches
commentary
controversy
Chatter
chit-chat
chit-chat
chit-chat
Conversation
contradiction
criticism
It's only talk
Cheap talk
Talk
talk
it's only talk
Debates
discussions
These are words with a D this time
Dialogue
dualogue
diatribe
Dissention
declamation
Double talk
double talk
Talk
talk
it's all talk
Too much talk
Small talk
Talk that trash
Expressions
editorials
expugnations
exclamations
enfadulations
It's all talk
Elephant talk
elephant talk
elephant talk
I have no "beliefs" about Rossi. I have beliefs about his technology. The difference is that I am relying on hard facts on the subject, and you are relying on innuendo and speculation.
YOU HAVE NO PROOF, not one single item of provable fact that the technology is fraudulent. Your "arguments from authority" mean precisely zero to me, because I an sufficiently knowledgable in the area to not need an external authority. I'm capable of looking at the SCIENCE evidence and drawing the necessary conclusions.
I suggest you spend some time on Vortex-L on a thread about "Rossi comments about "It Was Sent Back" where a major discussion is going on about Rossi's "truthiness" or lack of same.
Jone Beene:
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:43:09 -0800
Having said all that - let me be clear that good evidence still indicates Rossi has invented a robust energy anomaly.
That is where myself and Yugo part company. She believes that the dishonesty extends to everything, but that is wrong. At the bottom of it all, there is enough proof from other honest sources, and from 22 years of positive R&D - that this energy anomaly is now ready for prime time - that we should not abandon Rossi altogether.
Mary Yugo could be your twin in her (there is evidence that "she" isn't she...perhaps she is YOU) lack of technical capacity and viewpoint on Rossi, and uses virtually the same argument.