Replies

"I provided the link to his statement. The fact that you are unable or unwilling to read the original statement shows how stupid or biased you are."

I read the original statement LONG before you posted the link.

"Brian Ahern obviously thinks Rossi is a fraud."

Brian Ahern is a Rossi competitor, not a neutral party. But of course, you ignore any facts that don't foster your propaganda.

"And, if you bothered to read Zawodny's comments (just two messages above your ignorant response), you'll see that he doesn't believe that Rossi or Defkalion have demonstrated anything."

And Zawodny has ALSO applied for a patent in the area of LENR, and hence is a competitor.

"Ahern and Zawodny are far more credible than Jed Rothwell.

No. Rothwell has proven his credibility for years. You can say that A and Z have more technical expertise....NOT credibility. Rothwell believes LANR is real, but he has honestly looked at ALL THE DATA. And he's certainly more credible than Krivit, who you put unreserved faith in.

"And, you're just a joke."

And you're nuts.

Brian Ahern is a Rossi competitor
And Zawodny has ALSO applied for a patent in the area of LENR, and hence is a competitor.

So... you're excluding the opinions of anyone who has done serious research on the subject.

No. Rothwell has proven his credibility for years. You can say that A and Z have more technical expertise....NOT credibility. Rothwell believes LANR is real, but he has honestly looked at ALL THE DATA.

But... you do accept someone who has done no actual research.

Thanks for proving my point for me.

And he's certainly more credible than Krivit, who you put unreserved faith in.

My only "faith" in Krivit is that he has so far published reliable links to other's data. That would be data you've consistently ignored because you just don't like it.

By the way, we're still waiting for the isotopic analysis of Rossi's "fuel" and "ash" that Kullander promised by Christmas. It's a shame that the first bit of actual evidence that might have given Rossi some credibility is nowhere to be seen.

No. Rothwell has proven his credibility for years. You can say that A and Z have more technical expertise....NOT credibility.

That's an absolutely hysterical statement from someone who thinks that the anonymous representative of Rossi's "secret" anonymous customer has credibility. You obviously don't know the meaning of the word "credible".

No. Rothwell has proven his credibility for years. You can say that A and Z have more technical expertise....NOT credibility. Rothwell believes LANR is real, but he has honestly looked at ALL THE DATA. And he's certainly more credible than Krivit, who you put unreserved faith in.

My problem with Rothwell is that he thinks (or appears to think) that he is the gatekeeper of anything LENR. So, when someone mentions something he's not aware of, he goes off on them until it either gets Jed's stamp of approval or he rejects it.

Now, I'll be the first person to admit that I already had an opinion on the guy just from reading one article.

So, my questions are:
1) Is Jed Rothwell an independent and honest source of LENR news?
2) An LENR booster without regard to facts (like Sterling Allan even though I don't get that type of feeling from Jed)?
3) Is he using his writing to associate himself with LENR so he can either claim he was part of it or that he was the one that brought it mainstream?
4) Simply tired of dealing with the naysayers every day so he gives them short shrift attention?

As the librarian of LENR.org, he is doing a good job. It's nice to see a page with content and not animated links or God know what else that tend to make sites like that unreadable and a joke.

There's no hurry on the answer. Unfortunately, I didn't get much chance to read as I was wrenching this weekend. Working with SS oil lines is not fun, especially when there is zero slack in them. That and electrical but at least electrical is child's play.

Oh yeah, Defkalion. I posted three photos of their 'labs'. Each source photo had a caption that made it seem that each lab is separate buy they had the focus so tight, you couldn't really see the rooms. What you could see, is that the rooms all appeared the same. They had an announcement on New Year's day but I can't find it. I think it has been November since they showed the three photos of the Hyperion in their labs. While I originally thought the Hyperion was a power source run by their version of the E-cat but now, I think it's their version of the E-cat. They said they had theirs ready for tests so what happened; has anyone heard anything since January 1?