My, you have a selective memory, don't you. There have been DOZENS of "qualified outside observers" examining the E-cat, yet you choose to believe only those who pan Rossi.
Of course, this is no different from the rest of your factoids.
"Not as interesting as Rossi becoming "enraged" when they dared to ask meaningful questions about his gadget."
"Meaningful questions" as in seeking information on things that are trade secrets, perhaps. Indicating that the viewers were actually competitors rather than customers. I think I'd get PO'd at that, too.
Stealing once again from Jed Rothwell
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-
See p. 32. As you see this is Run II. There were several others. McKubre
remarked that he knows a highly qualified person who was present. I know
several, and I know of other independent tests. Some of them failed, like
the NASA test. Others succeeded.
As I have pointed out here before, if this machine was fake he would make
it appear to work every time, on demand, especially when he has important
visitors such as NASA. If he wanted to give it versimillitude perhaps he
would have it fail when unimportant people come, or he would have it fail
at first and then the next day start to work. That is not what has
happened. In some cases it has gone for days without saying boo. That is
characteristic of genuine cutting-edge prototype new technology, such as
the early incandescent lights, internal combustion engines, transistors,
and rockets.
- Jed