Posted on 01/10/2012 9:54:51 AM PST by mnehring
Ron Paul could be Saddam Hussein’s best friend. The pervert Paul has never met a dictator or terrorist that he didn’t like.
The pervert Paul consistently defends dictators and terrorists while attacking America and real conservatives.
What new enemy have we created? And how is Saddam Hussein an imaginary enemy? Saddam was an openly sworn enemy of the United States.
And now you want to argue that the debt of war is crashing our nation? That is 100% a Code Pink and democrat party talking point. The war in Iraq though was surely prolonged by leftist traitors like Ron Paul, Robert KKK Byrd, Code Pink and the rest of the libertarian/ liberal leftist alliance who continually have beat their chests in blaming America and giving moral support to our enemies.
It is traitorous loser perverts like Ron Paul who are trying to crash this nation by acting as the enemy within. Another attack on American soil could result in 300,000 dead Americans or even possibly 3 million Americans dead and how is that going to help our economy? Yet traitors like Paul would be out the very next day blaming America again and trying to attack every effort we would make to defend ourselves as being un-Constitutional.
It is customary for assylum patients to call people outside crazy. Fortunately, most people in US are sane:
DRUDGE PRIMARY NOW OPEN RON 28% MITT 27% RICK 20% NEWT 14%
According to a poll yesterday, Romney and Paul are the only ones polling better than Obama in the general.
Thanks for another Romney-pimping blog post.
Funny how you didn't bitch about this when you were supporting Cain.
Thanks for your post mnehring.....
Paulites like Samagon make up for their lack of Conservatism and clear thinking, with the passion and zeal of a doomsday preacher atop a soapbox in Pershing Square on a Sunday morning.
They are entitled to their opinions, but never their own “facts” as your post illustrates.
At times I envy their motivation, but I never envy their eyes!
“Daniel-san, Look eyes.... always look eyes!”
Looking into Ron Paul’s eyes many years ago, I gazed into the terrifyingly empty pools of the abyss..... he’s been a non-entity for me ever since......JMHO
Can we discuss issues instead? After whole barrage of indignant responses, I am yet to see an answer to my simple question: Who is better? It looks increasingly likely that Romney and Paul will get to finish line. Will you consciously choose Romney over Paul? And stop that "paulite" crap, it gets stale.
“Eyes? What other Ron Paul’s body parts you don’t like? His left thumb disturbs me immensely...”
Sorry FRiend, but most recognize that the eyes are a gateway into the soul. If you choose to ignore a person’s eye’s when they go all wild and crazy, that’s your problem.
“Can we discuss issues instead?”
Not if you think RP is the issue. I, and most other people, dismissed him as a creditable candidate or a representative Conservative years ago. Let’s face it, at best, RP is like the blind squirrel that every now and then finds an acorn. Waving the Constitution about and claiming purity at every turn does not make one right, much less Conservative. I will not play your game and elevate that man’s rhetoric to the level of “serious discussion.”
Closed minded....you bet, and dismissive too! RP’s “body” of rhetoric over the years, up to, and including the present, have conspired to closed it off forever. Looking into his eyes just put a padlock on that door.
My original post stands.....Ron Paul is not a Republican much less a Conservative......He’s a Libertarian, and as such, not worthy of consideration in Republican party elections or on Conservative forums.(Besides the fact I think his attempting to wear Republican clothing basicaly dishonest.) End of discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.