Yes - because he is not realistic about almost anything. In the debate, he just equated “welfare spending” with “warfare spending” in a very cynical comparison that is not based on reality and not squared with the document he claims to respect so very much: The Constitution.
He is not the quirky ole grampa who sticks to principles. He’s a politician in the worst sense of the word in so many ways.
Yes, they all are, but somehow folks give him a pass on this due to his quirkiness. They shouldn’t.
Paul gets a pass by so many because they project on him who they think he is not who he actually is.
Even if you provide written words and videos they will dismiss them or spin what has been said.
Paul has dangerous foreign policy ideas which makes him dangerous.