Reason #985-B To Think Ron Paul Sucks

My Undying Opposition To Ron Paul | 12/6/11 | Alan Levy

[little jeremiah]

This thread looks as though it might have the potential to be a bugzapper...

Have you seen this thread yet?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2816649/posts?page=1

The Ron Paul Factor (Why he’s surging even as others are stagnant or stumbling)
National Review ^ | 12/06/2011 | Robert Costa

[fight_truth_decay]

Michele Bachmann.

Do you think she is on any of the candidates VP list?

I like Bachmann..she can do what any of the others could do in that seat with much class and dignity. She just is not taken seriously enough-perhaps the old boy “thinking” network still rules? and who runs the media?

Ann Coulter appears in the Romney camp. Perhaps she sees better odds for taking a grand slam.

Rush does seem to always speak well of Bachmann.

[Jim Robinson]

Pushing the homosexual agenda is not pushing freedom. It’s antithetical to freedom!! It’s using government to force their unwanted perversions on a formerly free people!!

Take that crap elsewhere!!

If pushing the homosexual agenda is FREEDOM to you then you are an idiot.

[Darksheare]

Yes.
Is that carbon dust on my shirt?
Some furnaces I know to stay away from.
;-)

[little jeremiah]

So, what you are saying is that we must pass federal laws to protect ourselves and society from ourselves as we are incapable of making informed personal decisions or guiding ourselves at the state and local level?

This strawman of pretending that conservatives want federal laws about everything is getting extremely tiresome. I would say that what conservatives want is to have the fedgov butt out of states being able to make the laws they see fit to make.

[camp_steveo]

I didn’t push the homosexual agenda. Never have and never will. So, quit saying that because it’s making you seem like an idiot to me.

[little jeremiah]

Do you agree with RPaul that homosexuals in the military is fine and good and acceptable, or not?

[Absolutely Nobama]

“Until then, I’ll be voting as closely Libertarian as possible.”

Why are you here, then ? This is a CONSERVATIVE site, not a liberaltarian site.

Anyhoo, the federal government does have the power to outlaw drugs, especially when they’re smuggled across the border and cross state lines.

“Dr. Paul has been the only one to bring up the Constitution time and again.”

Too bad Dr. Demento has no clue what it means.

[Jim Robinson]

Just drawing a well-defined line in the sand for would be paultard spammers.

[little jeremiah]

You did not answer.

Are you fine with the repeal of DADT and therefore open homosexuals in the military, or not?

Yes or no.

My viewopoint, which unlike you, I am not scared to detail, is that homosexuals should NOT be in the military, and DADT was a nasty compromise, and it actually should have been repealed, and replaced with the previous “NO homosexuals in the military and YES we will ask”.

[gargoyle]

So, I take it you’re going along with the liberaltarian view of, “If it feels good, do it!”

...No, my "limited" Libertarian POV is that it's not my business to regulate morality for everyone except myself. The fact that I don't condemn somethings doesn't necessarily mean I condone them. If I try to stop someone with a gun to their head from snuffing them self, I might get shot. My life is more important to me than his in this situation.

...If we were to debate each issue instead of a blanket trashing of "ANY" candidate on this forum, We might find we agree on some things. The reason I usually stay off these threads is the lack of discourse. Too many here use the same shout down tactics that progressives use. I don't have the time or patience for that crap.

[wagglebee]

Yet another thread full of Paultard Spammonkeys pushing sodomy as "freedom."

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

[Boogieman]

“Preventative wars”?!? It’s not preventative when they attack first, Dr. Kooks.

[little jeremiah]

...No, my "limited" Libertarian POV is that it's not my business to regulate morality for everyone except myself

Where do you draw the line? Bestiality? Prostitution? Necrophilia? Incest? Polygamy? Polyandry? What about the age of consent, many people want to lower it or do away with altogether? Just what is too odious that you want it illegal? Or is it "all good" as long as you aren't personally bothered by it, say in your front yard?

[Absolutely Nobama]

I don’t care about VP lists, nor will I shill for ANY political candidate.

[camp_steveo]

So, someone who supports a candidate other than the one you support is a “pautard”?

Please to not reply to my posts. It’s a waste of my time.

[little jeremiah]

GOod, I was just thinking about pinging it!

[little jeremiah]

But there haven’t been any zots yet.

whine....

I have to run to the post office. Hope there’s some excitiment while I’m gone. Problem is that they refuse to answer direct questions. Freaking deceitful they are.

[gargoyle]

...I got an answer, you think the military and the spirit of the corps is moral? The military are hired to do one thing does one thing well, kill the enemy when called on to do so. If you're qualified to do that, who cares what your sexual preference is! I would agree that DADT should have stood instead of being repealed.

[Absolutely Nobama]

That thread will go nuclear. Jim has had enough of the RuPaulista SS and I can’t say I blame him. Enough is enough.

For the gazillionth time this week:

THIS IS A CONSERVATIVE SITE, NOT A LIBERALTARIAN SITE!