Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MasterGunner01

(4) there weren’t many trees from which to build houses.


Is there something with the soil that trees just won’t grow? Always wondered why no trees.


19 posted on 11/25/2011 10:50:52 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: txhurl

It was referred to early on as “The Great American Desert” for a very good reason. Not enough rainfall for forests to grow. Most crops now grown there are supported by irrigation.


20 posted on 11/25/2011 11:00:15 AM PST by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: txhurl
I really don't know why there weren't a lot of trees on the prairie, but there weren't — at least not in the numbers out east. It could be rainfall and the soil conditions just don't promote forests that are a prime source of building materials. There were trees on the prairie and some scraggly forests. However, they were not extensive so that all-wood frame houses could be built in large numbers. As the railroads moved west, they brought building materials from the east to to the prairies. As soon as more and better materials were available, the sod huts and houses went away.
25 posted on 11/25/2011 11:55:56 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson