So when you found it, did you change it? That is the point of Wikipedia after all.
Do you try as hard to remove retarded misspellings?
Wikipedia is mostly liberal.
Wiki is fine for non controversial things like the Marianas trench or the land area of Argentina but when it comes to political things, its pointless to try.
If I’m researching historical events I’ll use wiki as a starting point but dig deeper elsewhere.
Yes, there are times that Wikipedia can be irritating. But as a whole it is a true world treasure. If you think something is inappropriate, change it, and make a case for your change. Then fight for it.
1) Who cares what Wikipedia says about “opinion” issues. Want to know the speed of light or the number of nipples on a cow, go to Wiki. Want to know which religion or political party is best, figure it out on your own.
2) Of course there is “Christian supremacy” among Christians. If you don’t think your own religion is best and most correct, then why do you even have a a religion? I know plenty of liberal Methodists who refuse to state that Methodism is best, or that even Christianity is best, or in some cases, even that Jesus is the only way to the Father. When they start that drivel, I just tell them I’d find a better way to spend Sunday morning if I agreed with them!
Supremacy means victory...domination...WINNING!
Liberals have a problem with winning. That’s why they’re LOSERS.
The cold hard facts of history parallel that of natural selection—the strong survive. White men with canon and gunpowder went to places where the worst resistance was slingshots and arrows, and nature took its course. Advanced nations were born.
It was only when “progressive” sissies started installing vaginas on male bodies that media cohorts pushed public sentiment to actually feel GUILTY for prevailing and creating the FREEST, most BENEVOLENT Nation the planet has ever witnessed.
We never LOST our “supremacy.” We gave it away.