Skip to comments.
The populist site Wikipidia and their version of racial superiority
wikipedia
| Octorber 26 2011
| me
Posted on 10/26/2011 4:05:34 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Wikipedia is a classic example of why our founding fathers hated the idea of Democracy. When the majority rule Wikipedia is what you get. When most everyone is in agreement those pages are fine when they don't the Majority gets their way and this is what you get.
To: Steve Van Doorn
So when you found it, did you change it? That is the point of Wikipedia after all.
2
posted on
10/26/2011 4:10:09 PM PDT
by
mnehring
To: Steve Van Doorn
That's what you are supposed to do and is in the spirit of Wikipedia. Keep it up!
3
posted on
10/26/2011 4:12:57 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, serve my country, love my wife and daughter, and believe in the Resurrection.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Once in a while I go to Wikipidea in order too at last try and remove some of the socialist drivel from there site. Do you try as hard to remove retarded misspellings?
4
posted on
10/26/2011 4:15:13 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Wikipedia is mostly liberal.
To: mnehring
i found over the years if you don’t discuss the issue first they will ban faster then a rabbit flying through a mine field. Then just revert it back. That means each issue piece by piece it is a big job.
6
posted on
10/26/2011 4:18:59 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: humblegunner
7
posted on
10/26/2011 4:20:41 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
So you’re cool with free-form liberal spelling.
Like that which you used above.
You betcha.
8
posted on
10/26/2011 4:22:30 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Wiki is fine for non controversial things like the Marianas trench or the land area of Argentina but when it comes to political things, its pointless to try.
If I’m researching historical events I’ll use wiki as a starting point but dig deeper elsewhere.
9
posted on
10/26/2011 4:23:48 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Wow, you really write poorly.
You shouldn’t be editing anything.
10
posted on
10/26/2011 4:24:08 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
To: humblegunner
You sure do have misnomers about people
11
posted on
10/26/2011 4:32:49 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Regardless of your political vies, you sound like a moron.
12
posted on
10/26/2011 4:33:57 PM PDT
by
stormer
To: cripplecreek
I agree. That is why so many use the site and why we can’t ignore it.
13
posted on
10/26/2011 4:35:30 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Yes, there are times that Wikipedia can be irritating. But as a whole it is a true world treasure. If you think something is inappropriate, change it, and make a case for your change. Then fight for it.
14
posted on
10/26/2011 4:37:19 PM PDT
by
FoxPro
To: Steve Van Doorn
You sure do have misnomers about people You sure do have fail at writing.
15
posted on
10/26/2011 4:37:46 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(The kinder, gentler version...)
To: Steve Van Doorn
1) Who cares what Wikipedia says about “opinion” issues. Want to know the speed of light or the number of nipples on a cow, go to Wiki. Want to know which religion or political party is best, figure it out on your own.
2) Of course there is “Christian supremacy” among Christians. If you don’t think your own religion is best and most correct, then why do you even have a a religion? I know plenty of liberal Methodists who refuse to state that Methodism is best, or that even Christianity is best, or in some cases, even that Jesus is the only way to the Father. When they start that drivel, I just tell them I’d find a better way to spend Sunday morning if I agreed with them!
16
posted on
10/26/2011 4:38:26 PM PDT
by
Bryanw92
(The solution to fix Congress: Nuke em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure!)
To: humblegunner
17
posted on
10/26/2011 4:53:16 PM PDT
by
metesky
(Brethren, leave us go amongst them! - Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, The Searchers)
To: humblegunner; metesky
you guys are way to picky
18
posted on
10/26/2011 4:59:18 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Bryanw92
19
posted on
10/26/2011 5:03:30 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
you guys are way to pickyI think you're yankin our chain.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson